This proposal is written on behalf of UK citizens who wish to remain with the EU and who form the true, democratic majority: We the ‘remainers’ among the UK populous, who are by now, a majority, humbly request that EU Parliament hold the UK government to account and to please consider cancelling and/or suspending Brexit on behalf of protecting the safety and welfare of EU citizens and children.
Here we present evidence to support lawful suspicion that Brexit has happened as a direct result and influence, from an incompetent and/or corrupt British government, which itself, was not fully democratically elected and had relied on a 2nd party to form a 2nd, coalition government.
All points and statements shared herein, are evidenced via ‘References’ at conclusion of this submission.
‘Electoral system The elections must be based on proportional representation and use either the list system or the single transferable vote system’ (Article 1 of Council Decision 2002/772/ EC, Euratom).
In a nation like Britain with 4 separate voting States governed by 4 separate Parliaments; Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland & England, proportional representation needed to be according to equal representation within each state-party, as applies to separate UK constituencies in a general-election, in which case, the leave & remain votes equate to a tie demanding either, a 2nd referendum or else, Brexit is cancelled due to there being no clear majority on either side and taking into account that on average, approximately 40% of all the electorate did not vote and the ‘win’ for Brexit is claimed on only, a 4% lead.
The EU-referendum was not an election but nonetheless, the results will have a significant impact on the rights, economy and welfare of both UK and EU citizens. Leaving the EU brings such immense social, economic and political upheaval, it is difficult to imagine any genuinely sane and compassionate government would commit to that objective without a seriously valid reason: Satisfying a minority of xenophobic demands from a thoroughly oppressed, misinformed and dissatisfied population, cannot be considered as valid enough reason for a democratic-government to leave the EU.
Clearly, some among White UK natives, feel marginalized and ignored and unfortunately, leaving the EU will not in any way address their issue which in reality, has nothing to do with ethnicity of UK citizens and everything to do with banking and corporate interests having greater political-clout than the average working-class individual. Loss of UK nationalised industries and services to private/corporate enterprise that began with Thatcher, is minimised as an issue, by a corporately controlled media and government who, have abused their powers to establish the usual scapegoats of ethnic and religious minorities for a distraction: The working-class voice of power in Parliament, died with the coal workers, transport and steel-workers unions.
In terms of self sustainability, productivity, services and social security, Britain is in a very much poorer and more vulnerable position within the world-markets, than prior to entering the EU and much has changed since; we cannot forget either, that it was a Tory government under leadership of Edward Heath (known among survivors of his sadistic abuse against children as “The Claws”), that Britain got dragged into the EU in 1972, without even a referendum – only after much ado and under a Labour Government, did UK citizens in 1975, get granted a vote to either remain (according to terms of Labour’s widely debated ‘New Deal’) or else, leave.
As with the previous referendum, the people’s vote was merely to express the public’s most popular choice – the vote is not legally binding: Parliament has the ultimate choice about whether or not it is in the best interests of the UK as a whole, to act on the vote-results. A competent government would not grant a referendum if there were known and valid reasons for refusing to act on the results.
The government is there to represent the interests of all UK citizens and that does include a variety of minority social-groups and interests as well as, the best interests of a majority which, includes 40% of the population who did not vote and, the 48% among those who did vote who voted ‘remain’.
Given the enormous impact on the average UK citizen in event of leaving the EU, it is unfathomable that the electorate was given just a few months to prepare for the referendum and, the Brexit debate barely focused on the realities of leaving the EU: Britain’s commitments to that ‘marriage’ do not allow immediate ‘divorce’ without specifying the conditions and agreements for that divorce; the ‘spouse’ has rights too and the spouse has not requested the divorce and really, has done nothing to warrant the disruption of divorce.
Although England’s Parliament has relinquished on its duties of granting equal attention and rights to all UK citizens as one nation, in favour of passing general responsibility onto the separate proxy-Parliaments governing Wales, Scotland and Ireland (within what can only be described as a ‘having-your-cake-and-eating-it’ scenario), ultimately, England retains the power to override decisions made by the electorate among those various semi-independent States: Brexit is prime example.
England and Wales ‘leave’ voters have benefited from the larger populous of England, while Scotland and Northern Ireland are disproportionately marginalized as semi-independent States and with the whole of Ireland facing all of the risks associated with a hard border: Since the resulting ‘leave’ win is not legally binding, then it is within the power of England’s Parliament, to honour the choice of Scotland and Northern Ireland and permit those State-Parties to remain part of the EU or else, opt to abandon Brexit as socially, politically and economically unviable at this point in time.
Given the fairly recent peace established between Northern and Southern Ireland, the imposition of a border-barrier on behalf of a Brexit neither side voted for, cannot be considered in any way democratic and it is in fact, a perversion of democracy which has left people at a known and very serious risk of a resurgence of hostility.
There are two points raised from the above. First, is the right of Ireland to have a referendum to unite as one nation, being as England and Wales, has opted to leave the EU and forgo the advantages of EU membership. By the same logic so too, does Scotland have a right to separate from Britain being as both Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own Parliaments and elected leaders.
One might argue that Scotland has had its referendum for independence and has voted to remain part of the UK, however, at no point in that referendum was Britain’s plan to leave the EU, much focused on and also, there is clear and actually shocking video recorded evidence, that the Scottish referendum was rigged for a ‘UK-remain’ outcome.
Northern Ireland as a whole, is committed to remain EU citizens alongside the EU-remaining South; both Britain and the EU surely, has a duty to uphold their democratic choice as EU citizens of EU nations comprised of north & south and whom, among the numerous other disadvantages of Brexit, are facing resurgence of a harsh division across their Island?
From the EU perspective, there can be no lawfully recognised divide between either northern or southern Ireland being as under EU law, both sides have equal rights to the same advantages of EU membership.
The 2nd point, is in relation to the on average, 40% of the whole UK electorate, who failed to vote. Only 62% of the viable Northern Irish electorate turned out to vote and, since Northern Ireland was already an EU member, it is fairly assumed that those who felt strongly about leaving the EU, had to a greater degree, turned out to vote, which means, that the 38% who failed to vote, would probably, by majority, have voted remain: The overall result reflects this as an almost 50-50 split with 100,000+ voters swinging the vote for remain. Still, all of those non-voters remain EU citizens and with all the democratic rights granted to EU citizens,
Is it not a serious matter for concern that a referendum with potential to impose far reaching and dramatic changes to every aspect of what has become, a nation’s social, political, economic and trade culture, can be casually presented as an ‘option’ and with an economically and socially, severely oppressed and depressed public, being largely uninformed and thereby, unaware of the far-reaching consequences of that vote?
It is without doubt that a fully informed UK public would have seen a larger increase in the vote turn-out and with many more among the electorate, voting ‘remain’ i.e. Were the UK Steel Workers now facing unemployment via Brexit, aware of that foreseeable outcome?
Is it feasible that people working long hours, struggling to pay their bills, raising a family or else incapacitated via disability or ill health, can commit to doing the research into i.e. Brexit and what could be the results? Isn’t that what investigative reporting via a free-press and a publicly-funded news provider like the BBC, is supposed to deliver as a matter of public-interest? That news the BBC and ‘Sky’ etc., did deliver on Brexit, was extremely poor; very few of the serious issues were touched on and in that sense, the public were as much informed by what wasn’t covered as by that which was i.e. ‘Remainers’ out campaigning and attempting to inform people about the bigger picture, were thus relegated to the alternative/’fake’-news zone and were accused of “scaremongering”.
Because the ‘leave’ margin amounted to only 4% between all voting member states and with just under 40% failing to vote one way or another and taking into account that a ‘don’t know’ vote was not an option, it is again, undemocratic to inflict such immense turmoil on i.e. Scotland & Ireland, as leaving the EU will undoubtedly deliver and which those States did not vote for. For example, Southern Ireland being independent from Britain, did not participate in the Brexit vote and yet, they too are threatened with restricted rights, freedom of movement and trade, via what will be a necessary border-wall in event of a hard Brexit.
This is a huge imposition against a nation that has had no choice in the vote; effectively, England and Wales has undemocratically elected to impose a border wall via a referendum that the people of Southern Ireland have been excluded from and in which, the people of Northern Ireland, have voted against.
Is it a fair adherence to the principles of ‘democracy’ that the EU & UK grant greater precedence to the choice of England & Wales, as an historically oppressive, invading force of rule which, imposed division between north & south Ireland and as a result, it has taken centuries of hostility and only in recent decades, is now peacefully resolved and only it appears, for England & Wales to cast a vote to restore the division?
Can England’s Parliament, via imposing a publicly un-requested referendum on whether or not to leave the EU, lawfully omit and fail to adequately politically foresee and address, any such outcome as the prospects now facing north & southern Ireland and, with all aforementioned risks as confirmed during the previous division?
Apparently, they can. The question then is why and by what level of lawful, democratic governance? Can incompetence be tolerated as ‘lawful’ and accepted as a ‘democratic choice’? At what point does incompetence constitute the case for ‘negligence’ and at what point, does negligence become criminal to the extent lives are lost and rights-of-trust are broken?
Certainly, the risks posed by an Irish border, were not politically debated to any appropriate degree given the weight of political-gravity against any such border; all such debate needed to be addressed in detail many months before the referendum. It was incompetent that Parliament nor the media, barely at all focused on that outcome; it can be argued that such incompetence does amount to potentially, criminal negligence, should history be repeated between south & north Ireland as direct result.
Can the EU now ignore the risks against the EU citizens of both north & south Ireland and continue to accept, that the referendum’s ‘leave’ result also, applies to Northern Ireland and despite the electorate having opted to stand alongside the south as EU members? Does the EU have no duty-of-care to the citizens of Northern Ireland? Can the EU just leave those citizens at the mercy of far right, religious zealots whose historical battle against Catholics and prejudice against native Irish people, belongs in the 17th century?
The important point here is that the referendum was deceptive because what the people of Northern Ireland were truly voting for then, was whether or not, to have a hard border between themselves and the south. Certainly, voter turnout would in all probability, been very much higher were the electorate fully informed about what Brexit threatened to deliver.
The same is true for the average UK citizen who, as previously stated, were largely uninformed and even, deliberately dis-informed via the mechanisms of the ‘vote-leave’ campaign (largely Tory-led), that is known to have hired a global, corporate social-engineering firm i.e. ‘Cambridge Analytica’ which, is on public record as resorting to all manner of underhand tactics (spying, blackmail, entrapment, bribery and perjury etc.), for purpose of obtaining a desired electoral result.
It is known that all such tactics did have an impact on UK citizens vote. Furthermore, the leave campaign has been cited as guilty of overspending and publishing outright lies as a means of persuasion; one of vote-leave’s lead campaigners, Tory Minister Boris Johnson, until recently, was facing court hearings in relation to his heavily broadcast lie that Britain loses £350 million a week to the EU and strongly implying that were UK to leave the EU, that £350 million a week, would go instead, to the NHS.
At this very moment, it appears the same Boris Johnson is favourite to replace Ms May as UK Prime Minister: Is he a suitable candidate for managing Brexit negotiations? How can the EU commit to any discussions with a UK Prime Minister who has never been democratically elected, who failed even, to achieve a majority vote to remain Mayor of London and who is known to have delivered blatant lies in order to get the vote for Brexit in the first place? Regardless of which Tory replaces Ms May PM, none of them will have been democratically elected.
The thoroughly corrupt London High Court has quashed the case against Mr Johnson because Britain is a nation where the rich and powerful are accustomed to being above the law they apply to the workforce and it matters not, that Mr Johnson’s lies have brought UK citizens lives to the brink of ruin and persuaded a majority to vote alongside a of minority far-right extremists like e.g. Mr Farage who, while happily endorsing barbaric illegal bloodsports, believes breast-feeding women are offensive and “should sit in a corner”.
Radio talk-show host, James O’Brian (see References), presents a fair sample of exactly how misinformed Brexit voters truly are via his regular phone-in i.e. People commonly believe that the EU market prevents Britain from trading with other nations when actually, the EU trades with many nations and, as a large single bulk-buy market, is able to buy a lot cheaper than an individual nation e.g. Medicine costs are vastly subsidised by that method. In contrast, the UK will now have to arrange new trade deals, as a tiny market in comparison to the EU and therefore, costs for imports will rise dramatically.
Another Brexit supporter issue is immigration via EU membership but the fact is, prior to the referendum, the Tory government had passed legislation allowing private companies (mostly, global corporations), to bring in as many employees from abroad as they need. Even, there are global-corporate law-firms established in UK specifically, to arrange the legalities of it all. The only restriction is that corporate-immigrants are not paid less than £30,000 a year. Presumably, the lower-paid jobs are for UK workers?
None of the Brexit supporters nor indeed, any UK politicians, appear at all concerned about the risks to national security as posed via corporate-immigration i.e. Dyncorp a global military corporation with a base in UK (deployed throughout the Middle East on various missions), is available for hire by governments and/or other corporate entities. Theoretically, a hostile UK government or corporate-power in Britain, now has powers to import their own army who can be deployed toward ‘establishing the peace’ in event of e.g. A mass uprising among the people.
This leads to the next alleged ‘Brexit-advantage’ i.e. Ending rule from Brussels: Again, Brussels does not rule the UK, merely, it upholds EU standards of law and peoples, animals and environmental rights as well as, strives to deliver justice; every year, tens of thousands of UK citizens are forced to turn to EU Courts for justice that British Courts have failed to deliver.
The Brexit voters appear oblivious to the reality that minus EU, every UK citizen will be working and living according to corporate rules which are set purely, to assure worker control and maximise profits i.e. Zero-hour contracts that strip workers of those rights the EU protects; when jobs are scarce and there’s no immediate remedy of social-security to fall back on, it’s “my-way-or-the-highway”; people sign away their rights in order to earn an all too often, very meagre wage: Corporate and financial interests generally, are fundamentally opposed to all of the rights and protective legislations sustained within the EU and which, for the most part, were established in post-war Britain i.e. The right to unionise, retirement, pensions, maternity-leave, holidays etc.
The reality is, Britain has left the EU in order to depend on the USA: Examining the way America treats its citizens as compared with EU nations – it’s a simple matter which union is most advantageous to the average UK citizen and yet, just over half among voters, irrationally chose America? That choice is only understood as ‘irrational’ by those who have indepth understanding via extensive research i.e. The kind of understanding that should have been professionally broadcast by e.g. The BBC.
While it may be a pleasant dream for some, to think of Britain as a “liberated” nation except, the UK is not the same nation it was, on entering the EU: Britain has since then, developed within an ethos of EU inter-dependency: Brexit hopes to tear the graft from the host-tree in expectation that the ‘graft’/Britain can thrive on its own – it’s an impossible dream minus any solid plan to re-establish nationalised industry, transport, postal, communications, social services etc.
The Tory Government is happy to inflict major social upheaval and misery on behalf of bailing out corrupt bankers but no bail-out for British steel (privatised and sold for the sum of £1) – it appears UK industry and the workforce can be casually sacrificed on behalf of protecting their precious financiers from EU banking & tax regulations via Brexit.
Brexit amounts to little more than a mirage in an economic desert – leading the hopeful astray toward leadership-style-USA = war, crime, lies, theft, deception and extremism on every level of society, be it extreme poverty or extreme agendas grounded in a culture born of prejudice, paranoid-fears, prohibition and inflated ego-pride.
When one weighs on balance, the numbers deceptively persuaded to vote ‘leave’ via i.e. Cambridge Analytica and with the ‘remain’ camp vastly underfunded by comparison, the 4% ‘win’ on side of ‘leave’ is in all probability, entirely the result of disinformation, fraud, lies and invasion of privacy.
We cannot forget either, that the vote-leave campaign included employment of fear/xenophobia i.e. Britain would be flooded with “millions of Muslims” if we stayed in the EU and, the EU was going to have its own army and then, could invade Britain -presumably, to force Parliament to honour Human Rights? i.e. Quite the opposite of what the corporate army threatens to enforce.
Given the known impacts of propaganda (companies do not spend billions on advertising to achieve zero-results), it is reasonable to understand that minus the fraud, lies and invasive voter targeting, Britain as a whole, would probably have voted ‘remain’ and with a marginally higher turnout had the electorate been fully informed about what was really at stake.
The resulting Brexit-divide and its associated rise of ‘far-right’ extremism, has left minority-population British citizens, traumatised, maimed and dead. The population as a whole, is thus, deeply divided and left facing further economic hardship, major job losses, food & medicine shortages, a failing currency, substantial rises in costs of living via WTO Tariffs and, privatisation of the National Health Service/NHS.
It is again, evidence of incompetence if not criminal negligence, that a nation already struggling under imposition of ‘austerity’ (an economic policy recently described by the UN Rapporteur as; “punitive, mean-spirited, and often callous”), is knowingly placed at risk of yet further hardship, as posed by the hard-Brexit the UK electorate were convinced they were voting either for or against.
Having failed to reach a Brexit Deal with EU that would be acceptable to UK Parliament, Theresa May PM and her government, were making emergency plans akin to those employed for a nation-at-war i.e. Rationing, Councils being asked to stock up on food, proposed deployment of 3,000 armed troops in central London, commandeering the British Navy for delivering supplies, asking hospitals to “stock up” on medicines etc. The UK public were by majority, horrified as the full picture of Brexit-Britain began to emerge from the shadows where, within any true democracy, that ‘picture’ should never have been. Mainstream news reports stated: ‘Britain’s youth are terrified’
Clearly, Ms May PM’s government were and are, quite unprepared for the results of a referendum her government had imposed as an allegedly ‘viable’ option for leaving the EU and that is not because they were remiss, it is most probably because they had focused only, on getting fully prepared for delivering their despicable ‘New Deal’.
Ms May PM knew full well, that a hard Brexit would be catastrophic and indeed, she was banking on the threat of that catastrophe as leverage, in hope it would be enough to gain support for her ridiculous Brexit-deal which, no one voted for: How can it be considered lawful and democratic, to impose a publicly un-requested referendum which on one side, is actually impossible to actually deliver without having a catastrophic impact on the electorate and with the electorate completely unaware about that catastrophic risk and instead, persuaded that the greater risk was to remain in the EU?
The EU referendum did not include voting rights for 700,000+ UK citizens currently residing in other EU nations. It very likely that the bulk of that 700,000 would have voted ‘remain’ and it is very likely that is precisely why they were not granted a vote.
A similar scenario has arisen during the recent EU MEP elections; EU nationals residing in Britain, were denied a right to vote: Labour MP David Lammy stated that: “The [MEP] election system amounted to “ugly discrimination” for people who had endured “three years of being insulted, exploited and asked to apply to stay in their own homes”.
Anneli Howard, a barrister who specialises in EU law said ‘she doubted any judge would declare the election result unsafe as a result of council clerical errors, the principle of the issue could be established because individuals had the right to sue for compensation‘.
Is that how democracy works; people are unlawfully denied their lawful right to vote and instead of the election being declared void as result of that crime, the electorate is invited to “sue” the government and claim ‘compensation’? Can money buy back the rights and representation provided by one’s chosen voice of influence within EU Parliament?
Perhaps, as a direct result of denying a vote to EU nationals, staunch Brexiteers like ‘far-right’, Nigel Farage MEP, have ironically, been re-elected as MEP?
This is an extremely serious result in the sense that political opponents of the EU as an entity, have gained direct access to EU Parliament and therefore, without doubt, are there for nothing more than to create conflict within the EU and broadcast their far-right extremism. Was it even lawful that staunch Brexiteers have any right to stand for MEP election?
What nation would accept as resident, an individual who is loudly and fundamentally opposed to that nation and is actively employed toward demolishing it?
25,000 jobs are to be lost as a direct result of Brexit via closure of British Steel. By May 29th 2019, there had been well over 200,000 Brexit-related job losses throughout the UK; coupled with further public spending cuts and ongoing business closures, many more will find themselves unemployed at a point where UK Benefits system is in a complete shambles, with new claimants left waiting anything up to six months for payment.
Did the British Brexit voters know they were voting to lose their affordable, healthy food, affordable medicines, jobs, homes, rights and businesses? If not then why not?
In imposing the choice (while purporting to support ‘remain’ via a suspected political strategy of playing ‘devil’s-advocate’), the Tory Government leadership had a duty to ensure the electorate were adequately informed i.e. Despite being fully aware of the facts about how much in real terms, Britain pays into the EU per week, Ms May and her members of Parliament, failed to publicly query fellow Tory, Boris Johnson’s aforementioned blatant lie, plastered on a London bus and with images of that bus & slogan, given mass media publicity, while said ‘bus’ was being driven to various locations around Britain, filled with a veritable ‘fan-fare’ of “Brexiteers”, all heavily promoted via various online social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter and with a subversive undercurrent of explicit racism, ‘nationalism’, anti-socialism, anti-feminism and Islamophobia.
Given the “cruel and callous” nature of Britain’s Tory government and their economic policy that is, according to an officially recognised and widely published study, directly responsible for the death of 120,000 UK citizens, it is most unreasonable to assume that the EU referendum was imposed for purpose of benefiting the general UK populous; in reality, Brexit most favours, American controlled corporations as well as, London City financiers tax-havens: Britain is eagerly pursuing a USA-trade-deal on proviso that we abandon EU food safety regulations and hand our NHS over to US Health Insurance companies control and never mind that America’s healthcare system is presently, the worst among all Western developed nations.
In light of the 120,000 austerity-related deaths, the aforementioned Study, accused the Tory government of ‘economic murder’ and considering that by majority, those who lost lives to austerity, had suffered months of insecurity, economic hardship, associated relationship breakdowns, loss of family life, loss of Benefits & pensions, homelessness, unemployment, depression and damage to health via stress and NHS cuts; ‘economic terrorism’ is a more accurate accusation.
Suicides among NHS staff have risen sharply. This economic-injury so severely impacting on the lives even, of NHS staff, who are on the front-lines of addressing the results of austerity on public health, would ordinarily, be a cause for deep concern within Parliament; unfortunately, Britain is ruled by a government that considers its citizens as ‘expendable’ for sake of an ‘economy’ that heavily discriminates against the workforce in favor of the wealthy, privileged few i.e. the UK homeless and destitute via Benefit sanctions, are being prosecuted for begging.
Clearly, Britain has become a rogue nation within the EU, in the sense that via economic-policy, a feudal system supporting a politically and financially powerful ‘corporate-aristocracy’ has been restored at expense of all the rights and privileges won by the citizens of post-WW2 Britain. Apparently, criminal financiers and criminally negligent members of authority, are “too big to be prosecuted“. Such a situation equates to there being no law to protect the public, who by majority and individually, endure the extremely negative life-changing results of those crimes.
A couple of years prior to Brexit, Tory Minister, Ian Duncan Smith was compelled to provide an account of his draconian changes to the UK Benefits system, via a public and televised tribunal; at one point, he referred to UK citizens as “stock“. When queried about that statement he smirked and said; “You know that’s what we call them“.
In short, the British public are a people at risk under rule of a thoroughly corrupt and inhumane government that has behaved sadistically toward its own citizens/”stock” and, those of other nations i.e. Selling weapons to Saudi Arabia despite knowing the horror Saudi Arabia has unleashed against Yemen in an unprovoked and ongoing, military attack that has left tens of thousands of adults and children maimed, starving or dead.
The Tory government apparently, had no intention of delivering the hard Brexit their referendum claimed to offer (except, on failure of their New-Deal) and that is very clear precisely, due to their complete lack of preparedness in event of a ‘leave’ win and the resulting hard-Brexit they planned to avoid with their vile, nonsensical ‘new-deal’ which essentially, was designed to strip UK citizens of all the rights they enjoyed as EU citizens and actually, had previously enjoyed the bulk of, as UK citizens prior to entering the EU.
What British people were voting for, was a new-deal with the EU or else, ‘remain’. Clearly, it was important that the leading Tories were seen by ‘remainers’ among the electorate, to have done everything in their power to soften the blow of a catastrophic hard Brexit via their EU ‘deal’ and, in event of no-deal, can absolve all responsibility and portion any blame onto the electorate who had voted for the catastrophe. Basically, the Tories engineered for themselves and their coalition, a win-win situation with the most favourable result being the hard-Brexit that May, Cameron etc., had claimed to be against from the start begging the question; if the Tory government was truly so committed to remaining with EU, why impose the Brexit referendum for a vote in the first place?
Why did the opposition within UK Parliament, fail to adequately query and/or vehemently oppose the Tory proposal for a referendum, as divisive, unfeasible and actually dangerous within UK’s present economy?
This brings us yet again to the Irish hard-border and yet another angle of perspective on that issue:
Although a host of events can be cited as cause for worsening of the troubles from 1972, those troubles had got worse almost as soon as plans for joining the EU were announced; with hindsight of history, it is more than likely, the troubles and terrorism were covertly orchestrated precisely, to thwart the possibility for a soft-border with Southern Ireland’s entrance into the EU. In response to the deliberate provocation, up springs an invigorated IRA demanding unification.
As a result of the hostilities, Ireland remained divided by what amounted to, a military-operated hard border until 1998, when the ‘Good-Friday-Agreement’ finally paved the way for peace to the degree, Ireland as a whole, thereafter began to enjoy the same freedom of movement as all other EU nations.
Brexit is therefore, suspected as a malicious, subversion and criminal conspiracy to exploit the democratic-process, for (among numerous other covert advantages), purpose of trashing The Good Friday Agreement: But surely, that’s just a ridiculous conspiracy theory because Ms May PM has done everything to prevent a hard Irish border hasn’t she? It’s not her fault that the bulk of UK MP’s dare not put their name to her ‘New Deal’ i.e. MPs who knew full well, that the electorate, on experiencing the full impact of it, they’d none of them ever sit as MP again! And, by that point, those MPs were in no doubt that the vast majority of UK, no longer wanted Brexit at all and certainly not May’s ‘deal’.
Perhaps the Tory New Deal was designed to be completely unacceptable because their ultimate goal was and is, the catastrophic, hard-Brexit that would incur the wrath of their duped electorate suddenly aware, they’re victims of empty promises about a ‘beautiful, sovereign dream’ which turns out to be a feudalist-corporate-nightmare: It’s no wonder May was planning 3,000 troops for central London i.e. Home of Parliament: Would those troops at some point, be replaced by e.g. Dyncorp troops?
Reviewing the evidence and its foundation in history and, taking into account the veritable mine-field of rights and laws granted via democracy and EU membership, which strictly inhibit ability of powerful UK politicians to state (as Trump has done with the Iran Treaty); “We’re scrapping the Good Friday Agreement“; how else could the hard-border-partition be re-established without Brexit and, how could that result be ‘peacefully’ engineered and managed to such a degree, the public themselves, were to be the unwitting ‘fall-guy’ in terms of responsibility as well as, victims of what is now lawfully suspected, as a far-right and actually terrorist plot ?
The implications are deeply troubling given the enormity of exactly who and what is at stake: Is that level of suspicion something we can just casually ignore as a “wild conspiracy theory“? When it comes to fascists and their criminal schemes, there is no denying that given even a inch, they will take a mile…
The ‘new-Tory-deal’ could never be in any way whatsoever, more favourable to the interests of the general UK populous than remaining in the EU and, precisely because all details of the proposed ‘new-deal’ were never mentioned in relation to the referendum, we know for certain that those details would not be popular among an overwhelming majority of the electorate; hence the need for the Tory leadership to play devil’s-advocate and publicly back ‘remain’ while secretly, scheming toward their hoped-for ‘new-deal’…
It is a very important point, if not, a matter of great concern, that the EU referendum was not delivered in response to a majority call from UK citizens to leave the EU.
The referendum is known to have arrived directly, after Tory PM David Cameron’s failure to persuade the EU to acquiesce to Tory dictates and indeed, threat of leaving the EU was issued as leverage toward getting his way on his desired alterations to EU legislations and/or Britain’s ‘right’ to ignore certain rights and laws granted as a foundation of EU membership:
‘Why has the [EU] issue come up now?
‘A growing number of Conservative MPs believe Britain would be better off out of the EU and have been putting pressure on Mr Cameron to give the public a referendum. This has gained fresh momentum following the recent election success of the UK Independence Party and a string of senior Conservatives such as Lord Lawson and Michael Portillo backing Britain’s exit….’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22509588
In face of the evidence, it appears calls to leave the EU came mostly, from the Tories who clearly, saw an opening via an increased, ground-base of support among anti-EU-‘nationalists’ as organised members of EDL and/or UKIP; minority political factions hankering to “get back to British culture“, limit and/or prohibit refugees, impose a ‘Muslim-Ban’, clamp-down on illegal immigrants and avoid having to adopt all those ‘pesky’ EU legislations, rights and laws.
Rise Of The Far-Right
Clearly, there was enough subversive interest among the populous, to go for a power-grab and tilt the political balance to same as that of America i.e. Right & Centre Right and the ‘left’ being crushed behind a commonly instilled belief that anything left of centre-right, is Soviet Communism and an existential threat to “true” British values and culture which, allegedly, do not support free-education, social housing, a living wage, universal suffrage and universal healthcare within what amounts to a socio-capitalist economy, as enjoyed by Canada, Norway etc.
With EDL & UKIP thrown into the political-mix and gaining popularity on a par with the Lib-Dem’s, the Tory stronghold of electoral clout would remain steadfast and return UK politics and society, to pre-war standards where the bulk of the workforce had no political representation and are reduced to marching for their ‘right’ to form workers-unions and a Labour-Party…
We cannot ignore the influence of UK Parliament’s ‘Israel Lobby’, who are on public record in relation to their covert operations among the UK populous and politicians, toward affecting a desired objective: EDL Leader Tommy Robinson is a staunch ‘Zionist’ supporter, as too are David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson. Top of the Zionist list is to suffocate any speech addressing the plight of Palestinians suffering daily oppression and crime via Zionist-controlled Israel. So strong is their influence, UK Parliament has decided that anyone criticizing Zionist atrocities is “anti-Semitic” and criminally guilty of hate-speech.
In Britain, where once the workforce via the Unions, had representation and a powerful political voice and influence in Parliament, there now stands instead, the Israel Lobby. Even UK charities are no longer permitted to Lobby Parliament.
Is ‘Zionism’ a political philosophy or is it a religion? As an ideology promoting Supreme Supremacy of a “chosen-by-God people”, ‘Zionism’ is both a political and religious elitist-cabal, that has major global influence via control of the vast majority of the world’s corporate interests and banking systems i.e. Companies like Cambridge Analytica (who were also involved in the Trump campaign), very likely have Zionist backing.
The prime objective in the fascist power-grab, is to persuade people that their fascism is ‘righteous’ and the opposition to fascism amounts to a ‘terrorist-threat’ and combating that threat, is in the best interests of any populous the fascists hope to control. In relation to Zionism, this observation is confirmed via the openly Nazi supporters regularly witnessed among Trump and Tommy Robinson rallies.
We cannot ignore that hard fact that along with the rise of the ‘far-right’, attacks against Jews have increased exponentially. And, it is very strange that Nazi-supporters align themselves with self-proclaimed ‘Zionists’ like Trump and Tommy Robinson. Except, it’s not ‘strange’ when we understand the dynamics of of carefully planned and orchestrated, fascist-coup: Confusion reigns.
Social-engineering is a very useful tool toward raising a desired culture of ‘popularism’ for a political ‘ideal’ that sadly, does not at all serve the best interests of those relied on to most loudly and aggressively support it. By the time the duped awaken to the con – it’s too late, the deed is done and a century of hard-won social-progress is erased.
As one member of UK Israel Lobby states: “The real strategic goal is to get the UK to behave more like the US than Europe. Pull them – tug them into the US sphere…” (See References; Al Jazeera: The Israel Lobby)
Brexit appears to have achieved exactly that purpose and the British public largely beguiled into assuming a closer alliance with USA on grounds they share a common language. In reality, America operates on a level that is alien to European/UK society, in the sense that America’s social systems have more in common with pre-war Europe; the US is somewhat behind in terms of post-war social and political progress that took place from 1945 onwards – hence the attraction from Britain’s far-right who, like USA Republicans, have strongly resisted those progressions as “communist”.
It seems ‘Brexit’ via the gift of the EU referendum, has operated like a magic wand conjuring-up a variety of ‘goodies’ for the ‘favourite-few’ who e.g. Will happily abandon health & safety regulations on food, will run health Service for a profit and turn the sick and dying away because they have no money to pay; or else, will run a prison service for a profit too and lobby government to pass the kind of laws that criminalise ever more people – the workforce (having no ‘havens’) will pay the taxes to fund the prisons and police: Allegedly, human economy does not include the need to serve intelligence, a heart and a soul.
The UK political opposition i.e. ‘Labour’ led by Mr Corbyn MP, has now promised a ‘soft-Brexit’ via a supposedly, more favourable deal but certainly, not anywhere near as favourable as remaining within the EU.
Neither a Secret, Tory New-Deal nor a Hard-Brexit, is what British citizens voted for and a majority among those who voted for the so-called ‘hard’ Brexit (which really is simply, Brexit), on realising the facts beyond far-right lies and xenophobia, have since changed their mind about leaving the EU. This observation is confirmed by the 700,000 ‘remainers’ marching through London as juxtaposed against 1,000 attending an opposing Manchester rally – this was followed by over 1 million ‘remainers’ marching through London a year later and only 10,000 ‘Brexiteers’ marching in opposition.
By majority, the UK public is calling resoundingly for a 2nd referendum; it appears however, that a 2nd referendum requires lengthy Parliamentary debate; again, why did no such lengthy debate occur in relation to the Tory proposal for the 1st referendum and most especially, concerning potential outcomes for Ireland?
Unfortunately, a Brexit cancellation via a 2nd referendum, will probably be too late for e.g. British Steel: In all credibility, can the Tory government claim they had no idea that Brexit would leave tens of thousands unemployed via closure of a multitude of UK based businesses, all heavily dependent on EU trade? What lawful government would knowingly open the door to any such possibility and even, during a time of economic hardship and without any popular request from the electorate, for that ‘door’ to be opened?
Given the points of concern raised via all of the above, it is beholden upon the EU to recognise the inherent invalidity of the whole referendum and the distinctly unsavoury scenarios of a hard or soft Brexit.
Without doubt, the Brexit ‘win’ has already polarized the populous, promoted & empowered far-right extremism and dealt a heavy blow against, jobs, production and economy. Indeed, what else would anyone expect from a ruling political party that has “pledged” and “promised” to “scrap Human Rights” ?
Rigged Elections
Recent UK elections are lawfully suspected to have been ‘rigged’; the postal vote in particular, is highly susceptible to abuse as a Report on the issue, commissioned by Mr Cameron PM, confirmed.
A van containing 200,000 blank ballot papers got “stolen” during the 2015 general election; a few thousand fraudulent ballot papers deposited in key constituencies, would easily swing the vote in Tory favour: UK media at that time, right to the eve of the 2017 election, were predicting a Tory ‘landslide win’ allegedly, on basis of their polls which to be fair, are usually, fairly accurate. It is very telling therefore, that Ms May PM did not receive enough votes and was forced to govern as a coalition with the Northern Irish DUP (strong Brexiteers): With very probable, postal-vote-rigging in the mix, it is likely that Ms May could appear to have been elected via an apparent ‘landslide’ were it not the case that in reality (minus suspected ‘rigging’), she would have lost by a healthy margin to Labour. It is also possible that the vote was rigged toward creating the need for yet another coalition government…
Ordinarily, one might dismiss above suspicions to the realms of ‘conspiracy-theory’ except, we are not living in the ‘ordinary’, we’re experiencing the extraordinary in which, an (allegedly) democratic government, can employ an economic policy to strip people of their lawful entitlements, axe their public services & jobs and, via the method of economic terrorism, ‘murder’ 120,000 citizens while pledging to scrap their human rights.
Since by far, the bulk of the 120,000 dead, are found among the poorest UK citizens and with the vast majority of that economic class, being strongly pro-‘left’, it is not unreasonable to understand that ‘austerity’ amounts to a ‘right’-wing economic-attack, against a largely powerless and most vulnerable opposition among the electorate.
It is noted here, that the late Chilian President Pinochet, executed an estimated 3,200 of his people and incarcerated and tortured 80,000+ during his reign of terror. By comparison, two successive Tory-led coalition governments, have killed 120,000 UK citizens and many more than that, ‘incarcerated’ in poverty and/or suffering the daily ‘torture’ of resulting ill-health and/or struggling to eat and sleep minus a home and/or income.
For those on the receiving end of ‘Austerity’, the resulting dead and injured bear testament to an attack that has proven far more deadly than the blunt brutality of Pinochet. The Tory ‘cuts’ are so deep, they have literally, cut people’s lives short and, before the UK populous has had time to confront that terrible reality of 120,000 dead and react appropriately, the whole nation and its media, are thoroughly distracted with Brexit.
Is it merely, a ‘coincidence’ that Ms May’s lawfully suspected ‘rigged’ election win, effectively invites (to all intent & purpose) Ulster Unionists (formerly identified as an ultra-right/Loyalist-Protestant terrorist group), directly into UK Parliament just at a point her government is known to be planning a referendum to leave the EU? A referendum covertly designed to undo all of the advances made toward peace between north and south and thereby, satisfy the partitionist minority of Ireland as a whole and whose loyalties align firmly, with the political ‘right’ of Britain?
Ms May’s choice of DUP to form a coalition government was cause for concern among the UK general public i.e. No one had remotely envisaged being partially governed by a Northern Irish right-wing political party known to have and/or have had, strong links with the Ulster Unionist Party and both parties strongly opposed to a united Ireland.
In any event, it appears the ‘right’ have won their way and a minority choice is taking precedence against the truly democratic wishes of both north and south Irish electorates.
It is noticeable that Ms May PM has joined a few other EU nations in her recognition of unelected Mr Juan Guaido as President of Venezuela. Mr Guaido, as choice of President Trump and his Vice President Mike Pence, is favoured on the basis that the Venezuelan Presidential election is deemed ‘unfair’/corrupt. In fact, according to all external and highly reputable monitoring bodies, the complete opposite is true.
Certainly, by comparison to that of Venezuela, the present UK voting system is nowhere near as fraud-proof and does not at all, adhere to the principles of proportional representation. It is noticeable too, that Venezuela has opted to establish the same form of ‘socio-capitalism’ as presently already enjoyed in most of Europe and as established in post WW2 Britain via the Welfare State and with the NHS, being publicly cited as “the jewel in the crown” of that Welfare state.
Ms May PM’s strong opposition to Venezuela’s choice, to the extent she has abused her office to effectively stand against democracy in Venezuela, is indicative of an inherent distaste for any democracy that truly represents a majority vote delivered by a fully informed and politically aware populous. Furthermore, her support for a Venezuelan coup, has put millions of Venezuelans at risk via the same far-right extremism her government has commandeered in Britain via Brexit.
The British population cannot be described as fully informed or politically aware: One of the key components of a true democracy, is a free-press that will endeavour to publish any news deemed to be in public interest and regardless, if that public interest might be against the political or economic interests of the ruling political party and/or high profile citizens or public authorities: Freedom of speech is a Human Right exactly, for that purpose of challenging authority narratives and associated damaging public policy.
Unfortunately, the UK mainstream media is fast-becoming commonly known as little more than ‘the-establishment-mouthpiece’, there to ignore the general public interests and spout blatant propaganda in service to powerful minority interests.
While the Press are free to be either right or left wing, news-medias such as the publicly funded BBC, are required to be non-partisan in their news coverage and in that respect, BBC’s coverage of the EU referendum was on the surface, seemingly fair. However, the BBC’s “non-bias” coverage of the referendum meant ultimately, that extremists views and outright lies from people like Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson, were presented alongside facts and the related concerns, as an ‘equal choice’ – again, can lies and xenophobia truly be presented as ‘democratic a choice’? Can a democracy thrive on lies and xenophobia/stupidity?
Ultimately, ‘fascism’ is any philosophy or agenda that is fundamentally opposed to Human Rights and Universal Suffrage.
Is fascism an appropriate ‘balance’ for providing alternative debate for choice, within the concept of ‘right’ and ‘left’ politics? Is it a ‘choice’ to put the lives and welfare of the electorate at risk or is it not in fact, a crime? According to the far-right ethos, it is those exposing the criminal activities of the ruling, covert fascists, who are the ‘criminals’ i.e. Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden…
The BBC had anyway, already assisted toward preparing the ground for a xenophobic-Brexit; during 2011 and again in 2013, Jeremy Paxman, presenter of BBC’s ‘NewsNight’, granted mainstream recognition to ‘far-right’ leader of the English Defence League, Mr Tommy Robinson. He and his followers are recorded to target and harass UK Muslim communities and generally promote anti-Islamic rhetoric via online social platforms, often citing extremist/ISIS antiquated interpretations of Islam, in order to instill hatred among the non-Muslim populous.
Previously, just prior to David Cameron PM’s election, a popular multi-millionaire ‘comedian’ was featured on BBC NewsNight; he was granted a platform to air his debate (in guise of a grass-roots-Brit’), that people should abstain from voting. Without doubt, many among younger voters especially, were dutifully persuaded. While there are valid reasons for opting not to elect MPs who are not truly representing the voters interests, it is very suspicious that the BBC decide to promote that issue immediately prior to a general election via which, the Tories needed to get back into power in order to press ahead with their plans for Brexit.
Since Brexit, hate crimes against Muslims have risen sharply, with 50%+ of all hate crimes being aimed at Muslims.
Very recently and soon after the tragic, terrorist attack against the New Zealand, Christchurch Mosque, 5 Mosques in Birmingham were vandalised via a clearly, co-ordinated attack that is the mark of a terrorist group and yet, these are not considered by UK’s allegedly ‘free’ Press as acts of terrorism, instead, they are cited as “hate-crime”.
Emboldened by an increasingly extremist rhetoric of “nationalism” and Islamophobia, that has flourished under Tory leadership even prior to Brexit, one individual, shouting “Halloo Hakbar!” threw acid into a parked car; the Muslim driver and his sister were terribly injured and scarred for life as a result, with the male, being placed in a medically-induced coma.
Exactly how bad does fascist-instigated ‘Islamophobia’ need to get before all such rhetoric and associated violence, is recognised as an internal, terrorist threat?
None among UK Government ministers have had anything much to say about attacks against Muslims as evidence of terrorism, though in stark contrast, an allegedly “Russian” nerve-gas attack against two Russian-born UK citizens, was considered of immense importance with 23 Russian diplomats being instantly expelled and without a shred of evidence to support the assumption Russian agents were responsible for the attack and despite the fact, that the nerve-gas was deemed not to be of Russian origin.
‘The European Union defines terrorism for legal/official purposes in Art. 1 of the Framework Decision on Combating Terrorism (2002).[49] This provides that terrorist offences are certain criminal offences set out in a list consisting largely of serious offences against persons and property that;
…given their nature or context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation where committed with the aim of: seriously intimidating a population; or unduly compelling a Government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act; or seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation.’
If New Zealand’s Prime Minister understands that what happened in Christchurch via just one or two individuals, is a terrorist attack, why not also, Ms May PM in relation to numerous attacks against Muslims and UK Mosques?
The primary function of a democracy, is to combat the rise of extremism and/or fascism.
Commonly, it is understood that intelligent and balanced reason does not choose to vote in favour of either extremism or fascism; both are historically evidenced to empower brutal dictatorships. In Britain, the ‘brutal dictatorship’ amounts to an unregulated power of finance commandeered toward serving the sole interest of London City financiers and/or the corporate, political and military interests of a minority ‘far-right’.
Within the EU, surely, every politician standing for election, is assumed at least, to support the basic principles of Human Rights and Law that the European Union upholds? What happens when the assumption is proven false and malicious liars are fraudulently empowered enough to attack the Union from within?
The banking collapse (that forms the foundation of discontent among the public), as an economically extreme and catastrophic event, has been cushioned in the UK, via major banking-bail-outs which in turn, are apparently being paid for, by ‘austerity’ that has placed the heaviest burden of debt on the majority poor and working class; standards of living among the once comfortably-off middle classes, have dramatically dropped, while the ultra-wealthy minority, have received bailouts, tax breaks, public real-estate & businesses and a variety of often covert, government subsidies i.e. Working Tax Credit that essentially gives State Benefits to employers who, are thus able to pay less than a living wage to their employees; businesses get paid a lump-sum as a ‘reward’ for “training” someone whose “wage” is Job-Seekers-Allowance.
The economic-catastrophe is dished out onto the shoulders of millions of socially vulnerable and largely isolated individuals, surviving in a social climate of deepening divides among the working classes; tens of thousands have resorted to suicide.
All of the evidence supports the lawful suspicion that Tory-imposed austerity and the Brexit referendum itself, reflect a deliberate attack against the UK populous and with a direct intent to seriously damage Britain’s system of Welfare and to seriously intimidate the most vulnerable social groups within that population.
The Tories have seriously destabilized the fundamental economic, political and social structures of Britain and also, the international organisation that is the European Union: As the saying goes; “there are many ways to skin a cat” – just because the attack has happened via political policy from within a framework of ‘democracy’, that does not make the impacts any less terrible than the ‘traditional’ concept of terrorism; the results are the same and the cloven-hoof of fascism is once again, hoping to gain power via the backdoor of social engineering, fraud, propaganda, lies, xenophobia and deception…
Democracy has been hijacked by extremists who cite their rights of free speech to lie, judge and condemn e.g., a Muslim majority, for beliefs and actions of a minority and on strength of actually ridiculous levels of reasoning that state e.g. A male raped a woman so therefore, all males are rapists.
Free speech is not granted for purpose of perjury to spread malicious gossip and xenophobia and due precisely, to the fact that all such speech is known to incite attacks against innocent people. The situation is somewhat exacerbated by those standing up for the “right of you to say it“.
It is correct that people have a right to say as they please but people also have a right to hold the speakers to account; a lawful, democratic nation, does not have the ‘right’ to grant validity of such speech via mass publicity and especially not with assistance of long established and generally trusted news providers like the BBC, who surely, must know that such speech is designed to instill hatred and incite intimidation and terrorist attacks against minority populations within that nation?
The point is, true freedom comes with respect for the law and rights and welfare of others; if political-speech is not supported by fact and on balance of an accurate/lawful assessment of risk or benefit should one fail to speak, then that speech has no place on e.g. BBC News.
We cannot forget that Britain is a nation whose police in e.g. Rotherham, opted to ignore organised crimes against countless children, on grounds that they “did not want to stir up racial hatred“, by identifying and investigating Asian child-rape gangs and regardless that many non-Asians were and are, directly involved in those crimes.
UK Muslims are by majority, alienated from the likes of ISIS and by far, the majority of ISIS victims are Muslim. Therefore, it is hate-speech for any UK political party to cite ISIS beliefs and actions as applicable to UK Muslim citizens; a democratic, free news media, is acting against public interest when it deigns to give mass publicity to prime candidates supporting that hate-speech. Indeed, it is a matter of national security to ensure all such social hostility is minimised, in order to avoid what could potentially spark, civil-war. We cannot forget that UK Muslims have strong support from non Muslim UK citizens too, all of whom, feel equally at risk and attacked by what is commonly accepted as fascist rhetoric.
This Tory government and Brexit, are proven to have vastly empowered and even ‘normalised’ the ‘far-right’ perspective and its associated fascist rhetoric, be it against religion, women, the poor, the sick and disabled (widely broadcast as “scroungers” by UK media), ethnic minorities, homosexuals, immigrants or ‘leftist’ politics e.g. Some of the UK News media have published “news” headlines citing Labour leader Mr Corbyn MP, as comparable to Stalin. Because that comparison is not supported by even a shred of reasonable evidence, this amounts to a blatant abuse of media-power for purpose of instilling fear and thereby, manipulating the electorate to make a judgement and thereafter, vote on strength of that propaganda.
In juxtaposition, the aforementioned analogy between Pinochet and the Tory Government, is perfectly valid and founded on actual fact of what has happened and what is happening. Noticeably, the UK news medias have failed to publish that more accurate analogy as an alert and a matter of public interest.
Another important aspect of the Brexit vote, is that UK citizens have largely been denied many of their rights to Benefit directly from the EU. It is well evidenced that as EU-Funding became available, various impoverished communities and community initiatives, were denied EU funding and hundreds of £millions if not £billions, were side-tracked into a variety of ‘quangos’ and with many UK Councils redirecting EU funding far from the run-down communities it was meant to provide for.
Mr Cameron PM repeatedly refused the EU offer of £22 million a year, to stock Britain’s food-banks. Instead, the impoverished UK public are now required to contribute a kind of ‘conscience tax’ and donate items from their weekly shop.
Why would a government that has imposed austerity on its citizens to the degree that people are left dependent on a food-bank, stand in the way of their rights as EU citizens, to receive aid from the EU? Isn’t that what Venezuelan President Maduro is commonly claimed to have done? Except in Venezuela’s case, refusal for USA ‘aid’ was based on the fact that the hostile American government has imposed sanctions described by the UN as a “medieval siege“.
In light of Tory plans for scrapping Human Rights via Brexit (certainly those rights as a foundation of EU membership, could not be scrapped without Brexit), it’s very probable that Cameron was anxious to ensure that the EU was not in any way, positively perceived by the UK populous. Certainly, for those suffering the brunt of Tory austerity, many UK citizens have been suffering a similar ‘siege’ as Venezuelans – the only difference being that while supermarket shelves are full, millions of people have no funds to access the content of those shelves.
Stealth Privatisation: A Crime Against Humanity
Few among UK politicians appear overly concerned about that fact that dependency on a food-bank denies people’s rights of autonomy and choice, about what they eat. Poverty it appears, is a valid foundation for casually denying people’s basic Human Rights: Perhaps that is the real motive behind Tory slashing of 50% of UK’s public service jobs via ‘privatisation’?
Is it not deeply disturbing that many departments within DWP, are now earning corporate-profits; Job Centres, Disability Assessments, Social Services etc? Is that what a Benefit System & Social Services were established for?
Effectively, every child in Britain now has a ‘reward-tag’ potentially earning profits for privatised child-care i.e. £1,800 per week for every child on Social Service books and over £200,000 a year per child for corporate care homes. As a result, over 1,000 children a month are being removed from their families permanently and largely, on grounds of a ‘future-emotional-risk’. Family Support it appears, is not ‘viable’ and regardless that the vast majority of those children, experience actual emotional damage and are placed at severe risk, on forced removal from their home.
Austerity amounts to a present and future ’emotional risk’ to every child in Britain.
Already, children’s rights are casually ignored in Britain – a nation suffering what amounts to, an endemic psycho-sexual disease. Various UK politicians (including Cameron & May) and governments, have covered up evidence exposing high profile child abusers and with some of those given Knighthoods and/or positions of high office.
Britain’s acclaimed IICSA investigations into child abuse and associated authority failures, amount to a ridiculous waste of public funding when we understand that the EU Child Protection Directives, were created on strength of indepth studies into such crimes; nothing the IICSA can recommend, will better the EU Directives already waiting for UK to implement. Doubtless, Britain’s highly organised and State-Protected paedophiles, are strongly opposed to EU CPDs.
Since the EU has established the CPDs and since UK children are equally recognised EU citizens, the EU again, has a responsibility to take children’s welfare in account as its duty-of-care to children within its jurisdiction who, are left at a known and lawfully identified risk in hands of a government that has for decades, casually dismissed child rights and has instead, subverted the whole child care system towards sustaining a ‘legitamized’ form of child-trafficking and is pro-active in what amounts to, an attack against the family-unit and most noticeably, among poor and immigrant families.
British children are presently receiving what amounts to, an abomination of EU CPDs.
Organised crimes against children, are internationally recognised as a ‘crime against humanity‘: According to the United Nations Child Protection Committee, London UK is ‘Child Abuse Capital of the World’.
As developing human beings, child welfare is of prime importance being as today’s children are the foundation of future adult generations; it is a matter of utmost concern, that despite the EU investing vast sums of money, time and energy into devising the CPDs, Britain’s children are not benefiting from them at all and no UK authority held to account by the EU, despite countless pleas from the UK public – is it any wonder that many British parents are left feeling apathetic about EU’s commitment to justice and rights?
Brexit has left British and trafficked children at even greater risk.
Not satisfied by the first round of Britain’s Benefit System changes with introduction of PIP and ESA, now, it’s the ‘Universal Credit’ roll-out inflicting even more economic misery on claimants and children; people are left penniless for months and some if not many, being made or are threatened with, homelessness. Most disturbingly, many of those affected, are working e.g. NHS nurses forced to rely on food-banks.
Social insecurity coupled with severe economic hardship and emotional stress, are known as ‘key’ to inciting fear and its associated poor judgement within an ethos of economic panic. In reality though, the only people with a valid reason to panic about remaining in the EU, were the Tories and their London City Financiers whom, as time has told, are little more than a set of criminals engaged in pillaging public funds and money laundering the ‘profits’ of drugs crimes, child abuse, human trafficking etc.
With so many actually, very costly, changes to the UK Benefit System over the last 10 years and with costs being both financial and via loss of human lives, this is yet more evidence of how an inhumane economic policy, has been used as a weapon within a covert, terrorist attack.
All of this has happened under the supposedly ‘vigilant’ eye of EU Parliament i.e. Why was David Cameron PM, not immediately put on notice via EU Parliament, that any proposal to “scrap” UK Citizens Human Rights is tantamount to a threat against UK-EU citizens and even, against the EU itself being as the EU is fundamentally, established on the principles of upholding Human Rights?
The notion that an EU member State can casually announce its decision to scrap Human Rights, is a direct challenge against EU founding principles and demands a call for intense debate.
Certainly, anyone is free to say they’d like to ‘scrap human rights’ but not people in positions of power, who have accepted responsibility for the lives and welfare of millions of people who by majority, support democracy and all of their rights: When a guy with a gun says he hopes at some point, to kill you, we better take him seriously and act swiftly to ensure that ‘point’ is never reached. Effectively, Brexit has delivered the UK populous closer to that point and even facing threat of major civil unrest.
What is to be done on behalf of adequately addressing the myriad issues as exposed herein?
Firstly, EU Parliament needs to accept the severity of continued risk and actual harm, inflicted against the UK populations of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales via what amounts to, a hostile UK government: The present UK government needs to be recognised as a criminally corrupted force of power which, has conspired to subvert democracy toward delivering the kind of political choices and policies, that any lawful democracy is fundamentally designed to prohibit.
Secondly, the EU needs to accept that Brexit is equally, a covert attack against the rights and welfare of a democratic majority within both southern and northern Ireland and also, threatens to severely undermine the hard-won peace now enjoyed by both States of Ireland.
Due to the especially sensitive situation for Ireland as a whole, the EU does need to understand that no truly democratic, humane and lawful government, would so casually threaten that relatively recent and still somewhat fragile peace, for sake a satisfying the results of a referendum that was not demanded by the electorate and which, relied on mass data-protection breaches and perjury, to deliver the desired result.
Like many now, ‘Commonwealth’ former colonial nations e.g. Jamaica, perhaps Northern Ireland and Scotland, could opt to become part of the Commonwealth and simultaneously, remain within the EU? This scenario is very much more advantageous to the populous of both Ireland and Scotland, than remaining under English Parliamentary rule and suffering the results of Brexit. As an EU-Commonwealth nation, North Irelanders could continue to have freedom of movement to and from, the UK.
Thirdly, EU Parliament needs to fully recognise the covert form of terrorism this present UK government has inflicted against UK citizens and even, the EU as an international organisation committed to upholding justice, peace, law, rights and democracy.
On behalf of its UK-EU Citizenship, it is beholden on the EU, to indefinitely ‘pause’ Brexit until such time as Britain is governed by a Party that is committed to e.g. Upholding Human Rights and which does not use economic policy and xenophobic propaganda, as a weapon against its citizens. Only at that point, can UK Parliament be considered ‘fit’ to oversee a referendum on Britain’s future with or without EU membership.
Perhaps the EU will recognise too, the fundamental importance of Child Protection Directives and thereby, refuse to accept any ‘deal’ which does not include an agreement to fully implement the EU CPDs?
Brexit is not merely an issue unique to Britain, it has far-reaching implications against the EU as a whole as a vital independent trade-union which first and foremost, is committed to upholding democracy and a host of vital social, political, economic and environmental rights.
Erasing Social Progressions
In their attempts to avoid satisfying the higher principles of EU membership, the Tory coalition government, has been criminally negligent and has acted in direct opposition to what one would reasonably expect from a democratic government; quite literally, their time of office is best described as a murderous ‘smash-‘n’-grab’ and for purpose of realising Thatcher’s vision of a return to “Victorian Britain” but this time, with 21st century technology. Basically, we can ignore two world wars and the social advances we gained thereafter e.g. The UK Welfare state is a “failed social experiment” and the ‘jewel’ in its crown, our NHS, “shall be shown no mercy“.
It appears the antiquated consciousness of Victorian society, have somehow, time-traveled into the future in order to grab themselves some new technology to take back to their draconian, racist, sexist, far-right extremist, global empire, where fascism was the ‘norm’.
Surely, the EU was established in a large part, to prevent and prohibit fascism?
The new technology has come with the price tag of a history that involved two world wars dedicated to defeating and eradicating fascism, it is therefore, a form of theft, to appropriate full control of both economy and technology for purpose of denying the social advances that have developed alongside the technology; is only the material world permitted to develop and not the spiritual world of human thought and experience from which, the technology has arisen? Does ANY valid 21st century government have a right to throw those social advancements away? Shall EU women need to prepare ourselves for scrapping of our hard won rights of equality and autonomy too?
Observing what’s happening in America (the nation UK plans dependency on for food, medicines and healthcare); an allegedly world-leading democracy, is State-by-State, implementing laws to ban and criminalise women’s rights of autonomy over their own bodies; a self confessed, bragging sex-offender with 23 women citing him for sex offences, sits as President and certain elements among his somewhat fanatical fan-base, have produced xenophobic killers of Jews, ‘Leftists’, Muslims and People of colour.
As with the UK, compared to Venezuela, USA elections are utterly corrupt in that they are geared to deny, the democratic rights of those who can most commonly be relied on, to defeat fascism via the ballot-box e.g. The USA homeless effectively, have no right to vote. In many US States, anyone convicted of a crime (even when the conviction is spent), is barred from voting and, a perverse system of ‘cross-check’ is established to deny votes to over a million citizens (almost entirely, ethnic minorities) on grounds that they share the same name as a constituent in another State or even, the same State. According to all reputable sources, America’s electronic voting machines are wide open to hacking.
What is clear by now, is that the rise of far-right extremism/fascism has crept upon us by stealth and is all set to pounce on a largely unsuspecting and generally trusting, global populous who, are convinced that e.g. Nazi Germany, “couldn’t-happen-today“, when actually it could, as citizens of America and especially the women, are realising right now. As indeed, citizens of the numerous, war-torn/”liberated” Middle Eastern nations already know and none more so, than the citizens of Palestine.
Such is the power of the USA far-right, a Democrat-heavy Congress fears rushing into impeaching Trump and even, in face of the irrefutable evidence that he has committed financial-fraud, perjury, sex offences and has abused his office to obstruct justice as well as, covertly incite death threats against various individuals and US minorities!
In America, being a ‘Republican’ now equates to reverting back to the days of the wild-west, where guns were the ‘law’ and where women, natives and people of colour were slaves with few or no rights, where homosexuality was a felony and where shop-keepers were at liberty to put signs on their doors, stating “No N*****s“.
Burying our heads-in-the-sand and pretending it’s not really happening, down-playing the severity of crimes and risks, can only serve to grant even more power to what amounts to, an antiquated consciousness that has no rightful place in the 21st century world and which is ignorant to the inherent value of a humane and lawful/honest democracy – a consciousness that stands against addressing issues such as climate-change and protecting the environment: Human Rights are perceived as a ‘leftist’ imposition.
The rise of the far-right is already, gaining a foothold within EU nations: On behalf of those EU citizens with most to lose and who will be left most at risk i.e. Women, children, gender & ethnic minorities and the political ‘left’, it is imperative that the EU now acts responsibly and declines commitment to any ‘deal’ with Britain on grounds that the referendum result was achieved via underhand and fraudulent methods which are not in any way, conducive to serving democracy and solely, for delivering a result that is against the general public’s interests.
Perhaps it is necessary for EU and UN rapporteurs to monitor UK elections and/or referendums to ensure they are secure?
Had Brexit made any real sense in terms of genuine advantage to the UK populous, there would be absolutely no need for i.e. Cambridge Analytica, nor this discourse explaining exactly how and why, the vote for Brexit is a crime of fraud and theft and instigated by a criminal government which, has committed acts of terror against its most vulnerable citizens.
The EU either learns from the errors of history or else, we are doomed to repeat them: Never again, can a democracy grant such powers to a political winning party, that they may commit crimes against the populous with impunity and to such a degree, a whole nation and even, other nations, are placed at severe levels of risk and upheaval and all because the ‘winning party’ were having a “row” about wanting to e.g. Leave the EU and regardless of ALL the harms as cited herein: It took two world wars to defeat that kind of savage-selfishness, cruel-judgement and sadistic-ignorance: can our planet and species survive WW3?
Do we have courage to face reality – to pick up the sword & scales of justice and deploy our institutions of ministries, courts and police, to arrest the criminals in our midst for their crimes against humanity and our planet?
Rights & Laws are like muscles; fail to use them and we grow weak and only because we were too lazy, too apathetic, too silent, to afraid, too molly-coddled, too oppressed, too disconnected, too psychologically and emotionally enslaved to notice the writing on the wall; the nightmare fictions of Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’ & ‘1984’ are fast becoming reality and the facts of life in this world are all a ‘leftist-conspiracy-theory’ or else “Fake-News” i.e. Climate-change and the dangers of 5G.
Parties are for people, not politicians and it’s high time UK & USA politicians understood once and for all; winning an election does not give them the right to play ‘supreme-emperor’ until the next ’emperor’ gets elected: Representing a democratic electorate means first and foremost, to uphold a set of lawful and rightful principles that can never include an attack against our Universal Human Rights.
This battle for true progress, is not to be fought or won with bombs and bullets; it’s a war for our hearts, hopes, minds and future – we all need to make a choice: Do we, like present-day Republicans of America, love the narcissist’s hateful-wound of injured-pride about who s/he thought s/he was and what s/he thought was his-her ‘right’ or, do we love more, the laws and social-rights our forebears suffered and sacrificed so much for?
Do we love our planet?
Do we love our children enough to give them a future worth living and to raise them in a spirit of love and not hate?
References:
Article 50 petition to cancel Brexit passes 6m signatures
The number of signatories passed the 5m mark the previous Sunday, making it the most popular petition to have been submitted to the parliament website. The previous highest total of 4,150,260 was for a 2016 petition calling for a second referendum should the initial poll not provide a definitive enough result.
“Who wants Brexit so much that they are prepared to kill for it?” asks Margaret Georgiadou, 77, who started the [Cancel Article 50] petition.
Rigged Scottish Referendum? Why the Anglo-American Establishment is Opposed to an Independent Scotland
Scottish referendum vote-rigging claims spark calls for recount
The 2016 referendum was a badly designed rigged vote corruptly and unfairly won. Why is there so much deference to it?
https://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-2016-referendum-was-badly-designed.html
We need to destroy the election-rigging industry before it destroys us
Proof That The Scottish Referendum Was Rigged
Scottish referendum conspiracy allegations include vote-rigging by MI5
Independence referendum probe: How Scots voters were targeted online will be investigated
New research uncovers the reasons why the Remain campaign failed to convince enough voters of economic case to stay in the EU
New research uncovers the reasons why the Remain campaign failed to convince enough voters of economic case to stay in the EU
I was one of the 700,000 British people denied a vote in the first EU referendum – that’s why we need another Brexit vote
European elections: UK government may face court action after EU citizens denied vote
Landmark study links Tory austerity to 120,000 deaths Government is accused of ‘economic murder’
Tories don’t know the impact of 500,000 more public sector job cuts
Brexit Job Loss Index: 233,931 Jobs Lost As Of 29 May 2019
No-deal Brexit is ‘commercial suicide’, manufacturers tell MPs
British Steel collapses ‘over Brexit’ with 25,000 jobs at risk
The Guardian view on universal credit: fix this cruel, expensive fiasco
Universal Credit fiasco as 45,000 Scots seek help filling out DWP online benefits forms
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/universal-credit-fiasco-45000-scots-14120673
NHS should be shown ‘no mercy’ in drive for reform
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/may/14/david-cameron-adviser-health-reform
Tories Plan To Privatise NHS And Introduce Charging For Drugs And Treatment
Figures spark call for inquiry into ‘alarming’ levels of nurse suicide
Top GP issues mental health warning as 400 doctors die by suicide
The unexpected Conservative election victory of 2015 transformed British politics. Now an unprecedented Electoral Commission investigation has raised the question of whether it was even a fair fight.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/mar/23/conservative-election-scandal-victory-2015-expenses
Conservatives accused of trying to ‘rig next election’ as analysis shows boundary changes will disproportionately benefit them
Help us stop £1,000 billion benefit scroungers
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/help-us-stop-1000-billion-benefit-scroungers/
Conservative Party fined £70,000 over election expenses
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39289195
Whatever happened to the #ToryElectionFraud investigation?
Privatising elections, referendums and accusations of fraud and rigging
General Election 2010: police forces investigate electoral fraud allegations
Scroungers, fraudsters and parasites: how media coverage affects our view of benefit claimants
A million ‘scroungers’ on benefits for a decade?
https://fullfact.org/news/million-scroungers-benefits-decade/
Government under fire for rejecting European Union food bank funding
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/dec/17/government-under-fire-eu-funding-food-banks
Nurses like me are using food banks and taking out loans
James Gant (NUJ) exposes the foundation of core-corruption via diversion of EU Funding, within Sheffield’s [“Antoinesque”] City Council, in this very informative interview with Martin Brighton.
Brexit and the future of tax havens
Brexit Britain will be ‘huge tax haven in middle of Europe’ – ‘UK will PROSPER’
The Brexit tax haven: a threat to the UK, not the EU
https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-brexit-tax-haven-a-threat-to-the-uk-not-the-eu/
BREXIT BRITAIN TRADE DEAL WITH TRUMP: GOODBYE NHS, HELLO FINANCIAL CRISIS
https://waronwant.org/media/brexit-britain-trade-deal-trump-goodbye-nhs-hello-financial-crisis
MPs reject Labour motion to prevent no-deal Brexit
Top 10 Risks from a UK- US Trade Deal
Brexit Britain’s weakness exposed in US trade deal documents
https://theconversation.com/brexit-britains-weakness-exposed-in-us-trade-deal-documents-113077
US wants access to NHS in post-Brexit deal, says Trump ally
Donald Trump’s ambassador urges Britain to ditch EU’s ‘traditionalist’ food standards for post-Brexit trade deal
The Tories have voted that animals can’t feel pain as part of the EU bill, marking the beginning of our anti-science Brexit
Pinochet: Tories have forgotten that Thatcher PM wasn’t just a terrorist sympathiser, but close friends with one
Boris Johnson wins court challenge over £350m Brexit claims
High Court blocks private prosecution of Boris Johnson
https://www.ft.com/content/d3be7ec8-890c-11e9-a028-86cea8523dc2
Boris Johnson ‘lodges appeal over Brexit referendum campaign court summons’
Brexit: Boris Johnson ordered to appear in court over £350m claim
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48445430
David Cameron threatens to QUIT the EU over President row
David Cameron arrives in US as Tory row over EU referendum continues
Cameron’s ‘Brexit’ riddle: Row with EU or row with Eurosceptics?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-cameron-insight-idUSKBN0TY1AI20151215
In front of the press, Cameron said the new treaty, meant to impose stricter fiscal discipline on EU member states, went against UK interests.
https://www.france24.com/en/20111209-sarkozy-cameron-ties-france-britain-eurozone-crisis-new-treaty
Is this the real reason why Farage and Rees-Mogg want a speedy Brexit?
EU corporate tax avoidance rules come into force
https://www.publicfinanceinternational.org/news/2019/01/eu-corporate-tax-avoidance-rules-come-force
EU rules to eliminate tax loopholes come into effect
New EU corporate tax avoidance measures to take effect
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2018/1230/1019570-tax-avoidance/
I’ve seen how the EU tackles tax evasion versus the US – and if Brexit Britain follows Trump, we’re headed for disaster
Softer Brexit option would cause Tory party to ‘explode’, May warned
David Lammy MP receives death threat after EU referendum result
‘We are terrified for the future’ say young people as Brexit crunch talks fail again
Local councils should set up specialist teams to ensure there is enough food in their area in the event of a no-deal Brexit, experts have said
Hate crime victims left suicidal and afraid to leave home because of attacks ‘unleashed after Brexit referendum’
Just some of the times Nigel Farage ‘obsessed’ over Islam
Muslims and Jews Face a Common Threat From White Supremacists. We Must Fight It Together.
Muslims and Jews Face a Common Threat From White Supremacists. We Must Fight It Together.
Anti-Muslim hate crimes soar in UK after Christchurch shootings
Record number of anti-Muslim attacks reported in UK last year
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/20/record-number-anti-muslim-attacks-reported-uk-2017
New Brexit Party AM calls Tommy Robinson ‘courageous’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-48295617
Tommy Robinson is using Brexit chaos to advance his racist agenda. We can’t let him win.
EDL founderTommy Robinson leads ‘Brexit betrayal’ march
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tommy-robinson-leads-brexit-betrayal-13709691
BBC Newsnight faces backlash after leading show on far-right activist ‘Tommy Robinson’
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/tommy-robinson-newsnight-bbc-reaction/
8 Oct 2013 – Jeremy Paxman talks to the former head of the English Defence League, Tommy Robinson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03cp264
Muslim woman describes moment she was surrounded by ‘swarm’ of EDL members shouting racist abuse
English Defence League
http://powerbase.info/index.php/English_Defence_League
Venezuela crisis: Former UN rapporteur says US sanctions are killing citizens
The War on Venezuela Is Built on Lies
The War on Venezuela Is Built on Lies
Key points from UN envoy’s report on poverty in Britain
Poverty in the UK is ‘systematic’ and ‘tragic’, says UN special rapporteur
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48354692
Hundreds of homeless people fined and imprisoned in England and Wales
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/may/20/homeless-people-fined-imprisoned-pspo-england-wales
Why are we still using a 19th-century law that criminalises homeless people?
Northern Ireland: Is Brexit a Threat to the Peace Process and the Soft Irish Border?
https://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/1370
Zero-tariff plan for Irish border could face WTO legal threat, says Gove
Brexit: Violence if hard Irish border returns report claims
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47272124
Corbyn’s road map to a communist Britain: The Labour leader’s inner circle have detailed plans to turn the UK into a hardline socialist state which ruthlessly suppresses its opponents
The anti-Semitism crisis tearing the UK Labour Party apart, explained
Al Jazeera: The Israel Lobby – ‘A six-month undercover investigation reveals how Israel penetrates different levels of British democracy’.
https://www.aljazeera.com/investigations/thelobby/
The old Stalinist gang is back in charge of Labour
Workers’ rights: endangered by Brexit
Theresa May refused EIGHT times to rule out scrapping vital workers’ rights after Brexit
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/theresa-refused-eight-times-rule-11719778
David Cameron to ‘scrap’ Human Rights Act for new ‘British Bill of Rights’
Cameron gave a speech about his commitment to the cause of permanent austerity
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/13/david-cameron-austerity-public-sector-cuts
Interest bill on UK’s £1.27 trillion debt to hit £1bn a week
So, what will the UK look like after nine more budgets under this government? Ironically it might appear more like Victorian Britain, if current trends continue.
A tale of two Camerons and a return to Victorian values
Conservative nostalgia for Victorian era is dangerous
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/feb/24/conservative-nostalgia-victorian-era
Considerations on Rotherham, Racism and the Right
Claims that Sir Edward Heath was a paedophile are ‘120 per cent genuine’, police chief claims
Corporate Immigration
https://www.gherson.com/immigration/corporate-immigration
Legal 500 Human Resources Specialist Firm
Home
DynCorp International Targets UK Expansion
The DWP just fired the starting gun for the privatisation of the welfare state
UK Social Services: The mutation of privatisation
Click to access uk-social-services-mutation-of-privatisation.pdf
Major study reveals true scale of abuse of children living in care https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/major-study-reveals-true-scale-of-abuse-of-children-living-in-care-9587244.html
Organised child sex abuse ‘widespread in England’, MPs say
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-30083835
The stealth privatisation of children’s services
Forced Adoption Punishment without crime
G4S guard fatally restrains 15 year old – gets promoted
From Victims to Whistleblowers: new Initiative by the Legal Committee in Brussels
https://www.change.org/p/eu-parliament-abolish-adoptions-without-parental-consent/u/21559564
UK CARE SYSTEM BRANDED ‘DISGRACEFUL’ OVER MISSING CHILDREN
https://www.newsweek.com/thousands-missing-children-care-system-could-be-sexually-exploited-311607
STATE OF CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN ENGLAND
Click to access SOCR_2014_REPORT_WEB.pdf
Thousands of child sex abuse cases go unreported, says report
Convention on the Rights of the Child
https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=CRC/C/OPSC/GBR/CO/1
Inaccurate, misleading or false reports by Children’s Social Services and their refusal to correct them.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/inaccurate_misleading_or_false_r_4
Revealed: G4S youth jail faced abuse claims 12 years ago
Child trafficking victims disappearing from UK care at ‘alarming’ rate
How London became the child abuse capital of the world: Trafficked here by gangs, prey to pimps, paedophiles and murderers… the booming trade in ‘lost’ children that shames us all
Tories should bear the shame that child poverty in Britain is the new normal
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/16/tories-children-poverty-britain-austerity ��;i�
debdahvibez 
Leave a comment