On behalf of myself and fellow UK citizens, in response to Mr Johnson PM’s ‘Coronavirus Bill’ and in address to UK legal, political and, medical professionals (within both NHS and privatised healthcare), it is imperative that the issue of language, professional terminology and law, are clarified in relation to aforementioned Bill as well as, taking into account, a variety of extremely important factors.
Considering that among numerous other concerns, the Coronavirus Bill grants police & State, powers to at worst, remove a child from the family home on strength of being deemed at risk of or else testing positive for, a ‘coronavirus’, to place child into isolation with no legal representation and devoid of contact with family, that child may die via medical error and/or forced, experimental treatments with no investigations or inquest into the resulting death, no liability on part of the healthcare provider and, child’s cadaver cremated minus knowledge or consent from the family; without doubt, the Bill is far more terrifying and potentially deadly, than the threat via Covid-19 (SARS CoV-2).
The Golden Rule of Law prohibits any such absurdity whereby, the application of a Gov’t House of Commons Bill (published while Parliament is prorogued on strength of a pandemic-lockdown), poses a more serious and (as threatened in the Bill), ‘indefinite’ risk to the populous than the disease that Bill is allegedly, devised to inhibit.
Coronvirus Bill (HC Bill 122)
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0122/cbill_2019-20210122_en_4.htm
‘The Bernician’s’ presentation in layman’s terms (see link below), exposes the full scope of how this Bill could or will be ‘legally’ enforced, applied, interpreted, and experienced. Stalin himself could have written it:
https://www.thebernician.net/summary-of-powers-enacted-by-coronavirusbill/
Since Michael of Bernicia has devoted his life to studying and applying the law with success, in UK Courts and on behalf of defending his fellow citizens homes, his interpretation is received as from a trusted source who understands very well, how laws can and are, regularly and ‘legally’ exploited to provide room for crime and abuses of power, which heavily infringe on citizens legal and human rights.
Confusion begins via the curious title: ‘Coronavirus Bill’. Coronavirus is a medical term related to all strains of colds and flu viruses due to the corona-style spikes which, are the common feature of those. According to the letter of the law, the Bill’s title and content, strongly implies that anybody testing positive for any strain of coronavirus would be considered either sick with and/or transmitting Covid-19.
Noticeably, on page 25 of said ‘Bill’, section 8, line 25, it is stated:
“coronavirus” means severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
This is a blatant falsehood in light of the medical and therefore, legal definition of what a coronavirus-infection actually signifies i.e. Covid-19 or, any one of a variety of coronavirus strains of flu and colds among which, Covid-19 is merely included.
On page 20, the document states:
‘Suspension of requirement to hold inquest with jury: England and Wales
(For the purposes of section 7(2)(c) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 requirement for inquest to be held with jury if senior coroner has reason to suspect death was caused by notifiable disease etc), COVID-19 is not a notifiable disease.’
This again, is a blatant falsehood since Covid-19 is listed as a ‘notifiable disease’; ‘At 6.15pm on 5 March 2020 – a statutory instrument was made into law that adds COVID-19 to the list of notifiable diseases and SARS-COV-2 to the list of notifiable causative agents.’
Is the aforementioned statement on Inquests, evidence that the Bill was written prior to Covid-19 being publicly recognised as ‘pandemic’?
If so, how could that be possible being as Johnson PM held the position that Covid-19 was not a pandemic and his preferred action was to let it “run through the herd”? Indeed, is it feasible that a Bill of such magnitude was compiled in just a matter of weeks? Or else, is the blatant slap-dash terminology evidence of a ‘rush-job’? Can a whole nation be rendered subject to point of enslavement to the dictates of any such hastily produced, literally ambiguous and factually incorrect, HC Bill?
Since Covid-19 is now a ‘notifiable disease’, the aforementioned paragraph on page 20, is lawfully ambiguous or even, entirely false; according to the letter of the law in association with the principles of the Golden Rule of law, that entire paragraph is rendered absurd because a lawful fact is ‘legally’ defined as false and, since this fact relates to UK citizens lawful rights to justice and their human rights, again the Golden Rule, does apply in regard to legal wording and, in its broader application; Justice & Human Rights are foundations of public policy.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/coronavirus-covid-19-listed-as-a-notifiable-disease
The above UK Gov’t document-link (as issued to UK GPs), does also, clarify one aspect of aforementioned section on page 25 of the Coronavirus Bill i.e. ‘severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2].’ as the ‘notifiable causative agent’ of Covid-19.’
Essentially, the Bill states that Coronavirus = SARS-CoV-2 = Covid-19.
The above interpretation of terminology is then confirmed in a Government PDF, Crown Copyright 2015: ‘List of reportable diseases to be notified to health protection teams by prison and other detention centre healthcare teams‘
*Second on that list reads: ‘COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2
One then wonders how is it possible that Covid-19 could be listed in a UK Gov’t PDF published during March 2015? On questioning, government response is that the document was “recently updated”. However on closer inspection, the URL states very clearly at the end:
‘March_2015_FINAL.pdf‘
Furthermore, any alterations to Gov’t published Crown Copyright documents are legally required to make mention of that and the copyright updated to i.e. 2nd Edition March 2020.
*Due to WordPress editing, PDFs cannot be shared within text – please scroll to end of the article for both PDFs referred to here.
If indeed (as seems most likely), the document has been re-edited with failure to include the legally required copyright update, this reflects an appalling level of legal incompetence which in turn, does not instill confidence in the government and its ability to enact a new Bill and especially, a Bill which effectively strips every UK citizen of all their human and legal rights. Livestock on farms have more rights; the farmer is liable to prosecution should he treat his livestock cruelly such as e.g., leaving them to starve.
In contrast, Mr Johnson PM’s Government produced two documents in 2019, stating; ‘the government feels no legal responsibility for securing food supplies in an emergency – neither fire, flood, disease epidemic, conflict, supply chain disruption, nor no-deal Brexit.’
https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/sep19_government_says_it_has_no_duty_to_secure_food_in_a_crisis/
While it may be argued that a farmer may legitimately be compelled to leave his or her livestock to starve during an emergency or crisis, a human population with rights in a democracy and who are not property of a landowner as stock/slaves, have a government in place precisely, to be prepared for emergencies; why else do people bother electing a government or pay their taxes, if not for purpose of assuring their own collective welfare and national security?
How can UK citizens trust a government which first claims there’s no risk of a pandemic and then, after a flurry of media-led public pressure, agrees to a ‘lockdown’ (just at the point UK Imperial College has stated they had vastly overestimated the impact of Covid-19), and then, in a matter of weeks, produces this draconian, legally shoddy and dubiously titled ‘Coronavirus Bill’ amid a global financial meltdown and while issuing threats of Martial Law because a minority of the public are e.g., going out to buy ‘non-essential’ items when, during a lockdown, items such as e.g., paints and paper, may be a necessity for psychological welfare via art-therapy to help relieve the prevailing stress of fear and uncertainty?
Given that the government allegedly took steps to include Covid-19 in the list of ‘notifiable diseases’ for the 2015 directives for prisons and detention centres, it is remiss that they chose to update the 2015 PDF and not the 2016 PDF which, was re-edited in 2017 and thus, is titled ‘2nd Edition’, with Crown Copyright updated too and every page carrying the original heading from 2016. Why update 2015 and not 2017?
Clearly, the government had to pass a law to update the 2010 directives for GPs, to include Covid-19 in their list of ‘notifiable diseases’, why not also the same for prisons & detention centres since clearly, it is not listed among their most recent, 2017 directives for those institutions?
This level of confusion via official government documents citing legal directives and duties for public servants within government institutions such as, NHS, police-forces, prisons etc., not only fails to inspire public confidence, it fosters a strong sense of national insecurity and now, terror among the populous, as we absorb the dreadful implications of Johnson’s ‘Coronavirus Bill’ with its myriad loopholes and open invitations for immense abuses of power.
The ‘Coronavirus Bill’ is quite literally, an abomination – a blatant power-grab via callous exploitation of an alleged pandemic. ‘Alleged’ is the only term that can reasonably apply, in light of Imperial College updated recommendations and equally, the present coronavirus mortality being at present, statistically lower than in previous years and nowhere near, the peaks of 1996, 1999, 2000-2002 & 2014-2015; how did the NHS cope during e.g., the Winter of 2014-15 with a death-rate of 43,900 and many thousands more hospitalised, in the space of 4 months?
There were an estimated 43,900 excess deaths in England and Wales last winter, the highest number since 1999, figures show.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-34919149
Why do we need makeshift ‘isolation centre’ hospitals erected all over the country?
Why are the public being asked to “protect the NHS” presumably by not getting sick when the NHS exists precisely, to treat the sick?
Is it because the NHS has been so badly decimated under 10 years of Tory governance and having lost thousands of professional staff via Brexit, they can no longer cope with an average flu-season?
Did UK Gov’t not consider the impacts on the NHS, when they implemented national austerity and decided to push for Brexit?
Is Covid-219 a ‘pandemic’ because it threatens the lives of many UK citizens or because after a decade of Tory attack, Britain’s NHS is no longer fit for purpose?
Members of the public are alarmed to learn that NHS staff are being asked by UK Gov’t, to record ‘Coronavirus’ as ’cause of death’ for all patients who had tested positive for a coronavirus, regardless of whether a coronavirus had in fact caused the death i.e. A patient who dies of kidney-failure but testing positive for a coronavirus, is added to the list of coronavirus deaths and then in turn, the Gov’t then adds that death to the national statistics citing Covid-19 fatalities and then, utilising the bumped-up figures to implement powers of said Bill ‘indefinitely’?
Certainly, Dr Deborah Birx has openly admitted at a recent (April 7th), USA White House Press Conference; “If someone dies with Covid-19 we’re counting that as a Covid-19…“
Are UK medic’s testing specifically for Covid-19 or simply, for evidence of any coronavirus?
How can we collect reliable data for purpose of assessing the true risk and nature of infection spread and mortality rates, if the data collected is inaccurate and based on assumptions?
This Tory government, now headed by Mr Johnson PM, appears to have lost sight of their professional and ethical duty-of-care to the democratic-citizenship and have decided that lack of a written Constitution means Britain’s Constitutional norms, citizens rights, democracy and legal duties of historical and present-day precedence, can be casually ignored. It may be, that as a direct result of this dire risk as now exposed via Johnson PM’s Coronavirus Bill, the UK populous have a legal and democratic duty to lawfully insist that UK Parliament commits to producing a written Constitution: Trust in the traditional system is broken.
For purpose of restoring trust and with it, a sense of balance and rational approach, it is beholden on legal, political and medical professionals to speak out, to ask questions, to provide evidence toward supporting a vastly more politically, legally and medically humane approach:
Sugar for example, is known to dramatically inhibit immunity:
‘In the 1970’s Dr. Linus Pauling (one of the greatest researchers in the field of microbiology) discovered that vitamin C helps the body to combat the common cold. As part of the same research, Dr. Pauling found that sugar severely slows down this same process…
‘…In fact, at a blood sugar level of 120, the white blood cell’s ability to absorb and destroy viruses and bacteria is reduced by 75%. This blood sugar level would be easily obtained by any normal person eating some sugar (cake, cookies, candy, soda or even drinking fruit juice). Further, it can take four to six hours for the vitamin C concentration in the white blood cells to reach that optimum 50-times concentration again.’
https://alternativehealthatlanta.com/sugar-and-your-immune-system/
Naturally, a corporate world addicted to profits from sugar and all of the products which include sugar, would not welcome strict limitations or a temporary, even indefinite ban, on sugar. Far better instead, to lock people in their homes, ruin millions of small businesses, inflict major unemployment and roll out a Coronavirus Bill to enforce mandatory isolation, callous or even fatal treatments/experiments and, in that same process, strip every citizen of their human, democratic and legal rights?
Since stress is known to lower immunity, it is a medical fact that forcibly removing those testing positive for ‘coronavirus’, from their homes and loved ones (to be placed in total isolation and facing potentially deadly, forced treatments), can realistically, cause what would have been a mild or symptomless Covid infection, to reach its full potential. This is just one example of the numerous ways the Bill has potential to cause very much harm than it claims to reduce.
Clearly, Johnson PM’s Government, do not have the vital medical knowledge required to assess and address an infectious disease and according to the evidence herein, not even the legal competence to address that via their legislative directives.
What the British public needs now, is clarity and compassion within a world not only dealing with a new virus but also, a major financial collapse; millions have lost jobs and businesses – stress levels have increased exponentially and as previously stated, this does have a dire impact on human immunity against all manner of infections and immune responses. This present government appears to believe that police and military operating under dictates of the Coronavirus Bill, are the best ways to address both problems: A Bill to be in operation for two years and reviewed every six months with a view to implementing that Bill ‘indefinitely‘.
We need to consider other less draconian approaches to both disease and economy.
Iceland, unlike other Western nations, refused to bail out the banks and therefore, has not suffered the levels of austerity imposed in UK and in fact, their economy is strengthened via tightened regulations as a direct result; a unified population and a genuinely free media mean people are more reliably informed and as a result, are moved to act accordingly. Iceland began testing specifically for Covid-19 from February and has tested a greater proportion of their population than UK. Their findings are that 50% of those infected are asymptomatic and the majority, dsplaying only very mild symptoms.
Iceland has not imposed a lock down though public gatherings have been limited to no more than 50 people. Due to stringent testing and quarantine, Iceland initially, showed the highest number of recorded cases and yet, the lowest number of severe cases and mortality. Why? Could that have something to do with superior and less stressful social & economic conditions?
According to Iceland’s findings to date and equally, the fast emerging picture in UK, can Covid-19 truly be considered a ‘pandemic’ given that human responses appear to be no different to any other cold or flu coronavirus in the sense that most, display no, or very mild symptoms, while the aged and those with lowered immunity and/or known and unknown, underlying illnesses, succumb to the worst impacts?
‘As countries around the world scramble to fight back the spread of the coronavirus, Iceland is doing things a little differently from the rest — and the approach could have a much larger impact on our understanding of the virus.’
https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertonardelli/coronavirus-testing-iceland
By today, it is clear that antiquated political, social & economic ideologies and agendas be they far ‘right’ or centrist-right ‘left’, are inappropriate and in fact, the ongoing battle between one side and the other, often means facts and the solutions the facts support, are denied as ‘subversive’, ‘fascist’ or else, ‘communist’: Is a national health service ‘communist’ or is it an institution of a democratic-socio-capitalist society, which seeks to satisfy the needs of both right & left?
Certainly, nations such as Norway and Sweden, where democratic-socio-capitalism is the norm, are shown to record the highest levels of human wellbeing and happiness.
‘Are the world’s happiest countries better equipped to deal with the coronavirus?‘
The current national and global economic and health concerns require a fundamental re-evaluation. Clearly, Johnson PM’s government need expert, balanced assistance. While some may judge the content herein as ‘criticism’, the fact is, exposing legal and medical anomalies and failures are a necessary task; one cannot successfully tackle a problem if one does not have a true understanding of the problem and, what is the point of a right and left if they are not going to unite toward a common objective of eradicating present imbalances and resulting afflictions?
Burying embarrasing and damning social and economic problems via a heavily controlled media, only serves to permit those to quietly fester, to the point where the only ‘solution’ is to enforce a police-state in order to surpress ‘unsavoury’ information and resulting actions that will undoubtedly, demand major reform. Certainly we have witnessed a media ‘psy-op’ mechanism at work whereby, the unpopular PM states his plan to ‘do nothing‘, the media then incites mass public alarm toward calling for the kind of measures then, only imposed by China and Italy.
It is difficult to avoid what amounts to lawful suspicion, that this ‘pandemic’ is part of a globalist agenda designed to covertly satisfy their depopulation agendas, prohibit questions, information and mass public protests over 5G roll-out and yet another banking collapse now blamed on Covid-19; it was well understood among all economic pundits that this present financial collapse was long overdue. It appears that when it comes to New World Order ambitions, Covid-19 is the ‘virus with all the gifts‘!
While the globally corporate, mainstream and equally controlled ‘alternative’ medias, attempt to confuse the issues of EMF damages to life via memeing ridiculous & fake-narratives such as; 5G causes Covid-19′ – clearly, with a malicious intent to thereby crush ALL scientifically validated concerns about 5G as “fake-news”, the reality is that the 5G-grid coupled with connections to smart-meters in every homes, is scientifically proven to impact immunity via EMF radiation:
We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe (Scientific American):
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”
‘The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.‘
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/
Switzerland halts rollout of 5G over health concerns
https://www.ft.com/content/848c5b44-4d7a-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5
Is Switzerland operating under the foolish idea that 5G is responsible for a viral infection or, is Switzerland concerned about overall health risks to their populous and wildlife, as is confirmed via numerous scientific studies?
The answer is clearly, the latter and it is with alarm, we witness the levels of subterfuge in operation within the network of controlled medias, especially those commonly believed as ‘alternative’ but which are in fact, established to deliver ‘fake-news’ in order to detract from the genuinely important information as regularly delivered via genuine alternative news-providers who base their news on trusted and factual sources .
Major reform is the only solution; what this world and its political & professional classes need to realise, is that such reforms do not have to be punitive against any particular class, faith, politics or culture when we collectively understand the exponential benefits to our economies, societies and planet. Models presented by the Nordic nations, stand as an important lesson to the world.
The true ‘pandemic’ afflicting this world is not a viral infection, it is a psycho-sexual disease attacking the children in every nation. Because many of those afflicted, are high-profile individuals involved in other criminal activities such as, use of illegal drugs coupled with financial crimes and illegal trade in weapons etc., control over mainstream media is a vital compenent toward maintaining serecy around ‘sensitive’ issues and while simultaneously, protecting an inherently corrupt global elite who themselves, despite their immense wealth and power, fall victim to same depressions and afflictions as befall their lower social orders.
At some point we all need to accept that crime and criminals cannot be trusted nor relied on, to positively address the myriad problems that crime has caused by one method or another: As developing human beings, children’s safety and welfare is exceptionally important when we consider that today’s children are the foundation for and future of, UK society.
Examining Johnson PM’s Bill in light of what is known in relation to individual and organised child abuse, opportunities for child abuse are immense and we need to be very wary of any legislation that is fundamentally ignorant in terms of recognising the existing facts which, indisputably expose the reality that professionals within every UK authority, are known to have abused their powers to gain access to children. Certainly, the Coronavirus Bill provides ample, unrestricted opportunities for child abusers and this, is a deeply disturbing and very real concern. The same risks apply equally to women.
All is confirmed within the United Nations Child Protection Committee Report for Britain July 2014. The situation has worsened since then.
‘The Committee is strongly concerned that thousands of children continue to be trafficked every year in the State party, particularly for sexual exploitation and labour, and it expresses its deepest concern about reports that hundreds of children have been abducted from their families in Africa and trafficked to the State party for brutal religious rituals, such as the so-called voodoo and juju rituals. The Committee is particularly concerned that:
(a) The number of prosecutions and convictions of perpetrators of trafficking and other offences covered by the Optional Protocol is extremely low across the State party, leading to impunity for perpetrators; and that the prosecutors often choose to charge perpetrators of human trafficking with other offences, such as rape or abduction, in order to secure convictions.’
https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=CRC/C/OPSC/GBR/CO/1
‘Thousands of child sex abuse cases go unreported, says report
‘Up to 400,000 cases of child sex abuse behind closed doors, says children’s commissioner, as police chief calls for crackdown on internet pornography
‘Anne Longfield, the children’s commissioner for England, found there had been 50,000 reported cases of sex abuse over the last two years – but estimated the true number was 400,000 to 450,000.’
‘Only 1 in 8 children who are sexually abused are identified by professionals.‘
‘Children’s Commissioner calls for urgent action to improve the prevention and early identification of child sexual abuse and the support provided to victims.’
A UK MPs Report into organised paedophilia states:
‘Organised child sex abuse is widespread in England’:
‘MPs said all councils across England now needed to review child protection policies.
Their report said: “On the evidence we took, the alarming conclusion is that Rotherham was not an outlier and that there is a widespread problem of organised child sexual exploitation in England.”
The MPs inquiry was prompted by a report by Prof Alexis Jay, which revealed up to 1,400 children were estimated to have been victims of abuse in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013.‘
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-30083835
UK CARE SYSTEM BRANDED ‘DISGRACEFUL’ OVER MISSING CHILDREN
‘Analysis of data shared with Newsweek shows that, according to the Department of Education’s statistics for the year ending March 31, 2013, around 1,910 children (legally defined as under the age of 18) left the care system in England for unknown reasons, including 180 babies under the age of one. In the same period in 2012, about 2,260 children left the system for unknown reasons, including 160 babies.‘
https://www.newsweek.com/thousands-missing-children-care-system-could-be-sexually-exploited-311607
We cannot forget either, risks against Britain’s ethnic and religious minorities when factions of police, government and military, are aligned with racist and extremist/’elitist’ agendas (*far right (Islamaphobic) ‘Britain First’ has encouraged their membership to join Johnson’s Tory Party in order to provide ‘security’ for his leadership). Forced cremations for example, will cause immense distress among Muslims & Jews whose faith requires burial and specific religious ceremonies. Indeed, most of Britain’s society has specific cultural and religious customs in relation to honouring and burying their deceased: Tackling a new virus should not mean such customs are rendered obsolete.
*’Senior Britain First officials and rank-and-file members have been receiving their Conservative membership cards in the post.’
Given the powers made available to any extremists employed within UK police & security services relied on to enforce the Coronavirus Bill, it does not require a mathematician to note the exponential risk that some will abuse their powers toward persecution against religious and ethnic minorities.
The office of governance does need to take everything and everyone into account when it comes to devising a Parlimentary Bill. Johnson’s Bill is here shown to be largely ignorant of prevailing crime, corruption and risks against minority, vulnerable and/or commonly oppressed, social groups; indeed, the Bill does appear to not only protect high profile criminals but also, handing those, even greater liberty to commit crime with impunity.
On the otherhand, when it comes to the average, non-extremist UK citizen, Johnson PM’s ‘Coronavirus Bill’, typically (as with ‘drug’-prohibition), creates crime and criminals in that individuals going about what was previously, their normal daily work and leisure activities within their rights as generally, peaceful and law-abiding citizens, may now be judged ‘criminal’ and fined, prosecuted and/or imprisoned without trial.
At what point does Britain cease to be recognised as a ‘democracy’ if not at the point when ‘our’ government decides to prohibit all criticism of its errors and fascistic policies ‘indefinitely‘ and with powers to kill thousands via power of an HC ‘Coronavirus Bill’ allegedly devised to protect our health? Surely, a well equipped and staffed NHS was established in UK, to do that?
Mass incarceration and death are not the answer; the “too many people” trope needs to be recognised as a false narrative supporting a eugenicist ideology along with the notion that humanity needs to exist under strict control implemented via an alleged ‘superior’ self-professed ‘elite’.
From a more balanced/informed perspective, what we actually have right now, is a wealth of humanity with unlimited potential for positively addressing and erasing a majority of problems we currently face and which include, issues such as climate change and child development.
It is a known fact that in every nation where women have rights, education, contraception and opportunity, birthrates rapidly fall and while this does mean initially, an aging population within this present and next generation, the fact is, the numbers between young and aged will inevitably reach a ‘favourable’ balance.
Since aging is a natural aspect of life on earth, the most positive way is to accept that benefits of the elderly, far outweigh the alleged ‘disadvantages’ in terms of social and economic sustainability.
For a start, healthier lifestyles and diet are crucial; an aging population does not need to be an inactive, unhealthy or non-productive entity and indeed, the elderly embody an important, living historical record of life experience and wisdom, which are essential to the younger generation. Certainly, the relatively stress-free conditions within democratic-socio-capitalism coupled with a balanced economy, rights and free-press, are known to promote longer and healthier life-spans.
Present global agendas however, are known to preceive the elderly as posing a ‘pandemic’ risk against economy minus any regards to the fact that the elderly, commonly provide immense resource via assistance to the younger generation as parents and grandparents; it is fair to say that without assistance from elderly relatives, many young adults would suffer decreased capacity to survive independently and with ever increasing numbers becoming reliant on State assistance.
Therefore, the objectives exposed via the ‘memo’ as shared below, are inherently imbalanced. While some may claim this leaked memo is a hoax/’fake-news’, Dr. Margaret Morganroth Gullette as a highly acclaimed and academically accredited individual, cannot be described as the kind of person who would put her name to a hoax document; the narrative therein cannot be casually dismissed and surely, needs taking into account in terms of assessing the true nature behind current political, economic and social agendas such as, those emodied within the Tory-created Coronavirus Bill:
“Old people live too long and this is a risk for the global economy. We must do something, urgently.”
—Christine Lagarde, Director of the International Monetary Fund
The ‘Christine Lagarde Memo’
As a species, we either embrace the innate and natural compassion as is commonly found within every sphere of human culture, religion and society and, incorporate that into every aspect of governance, or else, we silently submit to a minority narcissistic, psychopathic governance via people who perceive compassion as a ‘weakness’ leading to disorder and ultimately, Soviet style communism despite the fact that Soviet style communism is precisely, what globalist agendas appear to be intent on establishing via centralised corporate-control over every nation.
Our collective compassion needs to extend equally, to those commonly perceived as ‘enemy’ by non-extremists dedicated to compassionate living; an amnesty is required in order to liberate those who have for whatever reason, fallen victim to following criminal ambitions, coercion and/or are unwitting servants to corrupted objectives inasmuch as, such individuals are rendered entirely unaware of the reality, that those objectives are inherently ignorant and therefore, are doomed to worsening the very problems their methods claim will be resolved. It is no one’s fault to be rendered mystified in a world of confusion and traditionally unquestioned privilege; mystification is not ignorance; as Jesus said: “Forgive them Father for they know not what they do“.
Johnson’s Bill is dangerous – very much more dangerous than Covid-19; it projects a forecast of repression, oppression and depression far into the future. Considering that Bill is established purely, on dealing with a new virus which natural, human immunity will eventually learn to fight and manage below ‘pandemic’ proportions (as is already proven among the Icelandic population), the Bill is both extreme and unnecessary as too, are the proposals for forced vaccinations whenever the proposed Covid-19 vaccination appears: A vaccination devised in a rush, minus the usual protocols required to determine the safety of that vaccination; there is a risk that whole populations being forcibly injected with an essentially, experimental remedy, will soon begin to exhibit an even greater pandemic via the proposed ‘solution’.
Again, taking everything into account, we cannot ignore historical errors, failures and resulting risks, toward increasing illness or disabilities, inflicted via new medications and vaccine impacts which, are often, unrecognised until it’s too late and the damage is done.
‘ Officials are trying to get to the bottom of how vaccine manufacturer Baxter International Inc. made “experimental virus material” based on a human flu strain but contaminated with the H5N1 avian flu virus and then distributed it to an Austrian company.’
More polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virus
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/polio-cases-now-caused-vaccine-wild-virus-67287290
Guillain-Barré syndrome and Flu Vaccine
‘What causes GBS?
‘The exact cause of GBS is unknown, but about two-thirds of people who develop GBS experience symptoms several days or weeks after they have been sick with diarrhea or a respiratory illness. Infection with the bacterium Campylobacter jejuni is one of the most common risk factors for GBS. People also can develop GBS after having the flu or other infections (such as cytomegalovirus and Epstein Barr virus). On very rare occasions, they may develop GBS in the days or weeks after getting a vaccination.’
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/guillainbarre.htm
In face of present day and historical knowledge, forced vaccination against a virus to which 50% of those infected, exhibit no symptoms and with only a minority of fatalities among the relative minority of those needing intensive care, inadequately tested new vacines are defintiely not the answer and instead, present risks as severe, if not more so, than the disease that vaccine is meant to prevent.
All of the issues, facts, evidence and concerns, expressed herein, are of paramount importance with far reaching implications for every future generation, hence, it is of prime importance and as a matter of utmost urgency, that UK professionals as listed at the start of this document, take notice and move to act accordingly.
Britain as a nation and humanity as a species, is heading toward a precipice of eternal doom & gloom leading ultimately, to our own extinction as well as, ongoing depletion of life on our planet in general as one pandemic leads to another and only because we have collectively endeavoured to treat the symptoms rather than the underlying causes of disease such as e.g. Industrialised animal farming along with production and consumption of animal products. As stated previously, vastly reducing our consumption of sugar and increasing vitamin D3 and also, vitamin C (which is necessary for the body’s absorption of vitamin D3), will dramatically improve natural resistance to all viral infections.
Lack of vitamin C and associated minimised absorption of vitamin D3 coupled with a high sugar diet, are very likely why the Black population of USA, are suffering a statistically proven, greater imapct of the worst symptoms via Covid-19. Included in this result are the levels of poverty and resulting stress the USA Black population are ‘traditionally’ and presently experiencing in terms also, of racial inequality and what amounts to, State enforced persecution.
*Darker skin colour is a known cause of lowered vitamin D3 in countries where climate is not conducive to maintaining healthy levels of human vitamin D3 absorption via the natural sunlight levels, darker skin colours have evolved to thrive under.
The pandemic seems to be hitting people of color the hardest.
‘In Michigan, black Americans comprise 14.1 percent of the state population, but an ungodly 40 percent of coronavirus deaths. In Washtenaw County, home to Ann Arbor, 48 percent of residents hospitalized with the coronavirus are black, though black people make up only 11 percent of the county.‘
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-exposing-our-racial-divides/609526/
All such evidence does need now to be professionally accepted as valid and, we do need to learn from such evidence in order to arrive at the most appropriate and genuinely successful courses of action, for purpose of not only addressing the impacts of Covid-19 but also, toward improving humanity’s health generally.
The truth is, there is too much waste in this world and that includes waste of knowledge, experience and wisdom, along with human lives and potential. In this sense, the democratic-socio-capitalist approach combining both left & right interests within social and economic systems, which do not negatively judge and discriminate against people on grounds of age, race, religion, class or gender, are shown to be most successful in raising a fair and balanced human consciouness and, in acheiving those ends, education and a genuinely free media, are key.
We have witnessed how the power of media has inspired mass lockdowns throughout the world and even, calls for martial law, as well as, covertly facilitating the draconian measures as proposed via Johnson’s Coronavirus Bill. Therefore, we can be in no doubt that a media liberated to focus on facts as opposed to publishing propaganda, can and will, have same powers of influence toward encouraging more balanced and humane social responses; it is the professional classes who are called upon now, to take the lead in this ongoing information battle via engaging in necessary discourse which both informs and challenges current proposals and agendas.
Covid-19, heralds a tremendous turning point within the human world and which way we choose to turn, will determine either a heavenly or hellish future existence for billions of people and the life of our planet. And, ‘choice’ is the prime point of importance here; who is making the choices for us and are those ‘choosers’ making the right choices ?
Every problem brings with it an opportunity for improvement, or else, the problem will increase, while all opportunity for vital change, is dramatically decreased until the point of no-return.
Our collective decisions need to be based on solid foundations of law, facts, evidence and wisdom. Our human world and our planet, are presently rendered extremely fragile and left vulnerable to the very worst ambitions devised by the very worst aspects of human consciousness; a consciousness traditionally established on historical faith in agendas which themselves, were established within then, seemingly rational beliefs based on what we now know as; misunderstanding, abuses of power and misinterpretations in relation to ourselves as a species, and our true place among the splendour of life on Earth.
If we cannot learn from the lessons of history, what is the point of that history? Why bother keeping records and teaching those to future generations if we actually, have no need for any such education? The point is, we do need to learn from past and updated studies, experience and associated outcomes, precisely, when addressing the issues we are challenged with today.
Are we facing a ‘deadly pandemic’ or are we not now invited to step-up to a higher level of existence and consciousness?
Humanity is thoroughly aware we need drastic change and it is not humanity standing against eco-technology, organic food and sustainably healthier living, it is not ‘humanity’ destroying Earth’s natural resources and poisoning our Pacific Ocean with nuclear-radiation. All of the above is by will of those same corporate-interests who have traditionally ridden roughshod over the evironmentally-friendly native populations of every land, and only to now claim. there are “too many people“.
The only thing there are “too many” of on this planet are lawless entities and privileged groups who know full well, that positive change for the many and our planet, demands a fair and balanced economy, strict financial & industrial regulations and also, a justice system, which does not discriminate according to e.g. Wealth & social status.
Since change is coming whether we like it or not, it seems the people of this generation are required to arrive at a judgement on the issues of right and wrong, law and crime, and why we need to progress within a spirit of unity, in honour of all it is that makes us most truly human: The greatest weight of responsibility inevitably falls therefore, onto the shoulders of those now positioned with most power of social credibity and influence, to challenge prevailing negative or suspect directives and simultaneously, support the numerous positive solutions.
Were we created to be like a devil or were we not, created to; “be like God” and, what would God do in face of all of the issues as highlighted herein, when dealing too, with a new and life-threatening virus: Johnson PM’s Coronavirus Bill or the Icelandic model ?
It’s high time we made up our minds about who we are and where we stand and what we hope to leave for our children’s children’s children.
*UK Gov’t PDFs below cannot be uploaded into WordPress.
debdahvibez 
Leave a comment