*Proposal for official investigations into Boris Johnson PM and various others as cited herein, via Security Services Act 1989 for the protection of national security and, in particular, protection against threats from espionage, terrorism and sabotage, from the activities of agents of foreign powers and via actions intended to overthrow or undermine parliamentary democracy by political, industrial or violent means and to safeguard the economic well-being of the United Kingdom against threats posed by the actions or intentions of persons within and outside the British Islands.

*For purpose of continuity, the majority of pertinent points raised herein are evidenced via links shared in References at conclusion of this presentation and via Document A and its associated links for reference

Britain is currently, in the historically unique position of suffering governance of a rogue Prime Minister & Cabinet, none of whom were elected into their respective positions via process of a General Election/GE but instead, are appointed by members of their own party on resignation of elected Prime Minister Theresa May.

The majority of concerns are expressed and evidenced in Document A: https://debdahvibez.wordpress.com/2019/07/25/proposal-for-revoking-or-indefinite-pause-of-article-50/

Since Document A was compiled during May 2019 and published July 2019, more evidence pertaining to our concerns has come to light and all of this later evidence to be disclosed herein.

In summary, concerns expose lawful evidence supporting lawful suspicion that the UK Government currently under leadership of Boris Johnson PM, is fundamentally dedicated to destroying Britain as a United Kingdom and a democracy and furthermore, is conspiring to severely undermine Britain’s sovereign currency and economy as well as, inflict major hardship on millions of British citizens for purpose of satisfying a variety of foreign interests and those of their British cohorts, as presently have positions in Government Office and among various financial interests.

The Supreme Court Judgement 24th of September 2019 has stated very clearly, that Mr Johnson acted unlawfully via his advice to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, toward satisfying his request that HRH prorogue Parliament for an unprecedented 5 weeks and during a period in which, Mr Johnson PM and conspirators, were intent on delivering a no-deal exit from the European-Union/EU of which, Britain has been a part since 1972 and with all of our trade, business, rights and economy, thus interdependent within that union.

Despite repeatedly claiming that his extended proroguement of Parliament had nothing to do with his plans for Britain’s exit from the EU on October 31st, directly on hearing the SC Judgement, Mr Johnson PM immediately stated that the judgement was delivered to “frustrate Brexit” and “stop this country coming out of the EU“, thereby implying the Judgement was part of a covert conspiracy and simultaneously, confirming the validity of Parliament’s case, that he had indeed, shut down democracy for exactly the purpose of getting his own Brexit plans delivered minus any involvement from Parliament.

An abrupt exit from the EU inevitably, will deliver severe disruption via economic hardship, substantial risks to human life and which in turn, threatens civil unrest as well as, the breaking up of our United Kingdom via Scotland & Northern Ireland opting for Independence from England & Wales, as is their lawful right within EU Law and as EU citizens of semi-self-governing States within UK and, who have each voted to remain in the EU: Parliament has a duty and responsibility to address all of these aforementioned likely/probable scenarios in negotiating conditions for Brexit. Mr Johnson PM attempted to stop that vital process of Parliament.

‘Operation Yellow-Hammer’ as recently published in redacted form to the British public, leaves us in no doubt that this government is fully aware of the terrible disruptions, insecurity and severe hardship a no-deal exit from the EU/Brexit will deliver. Of particular importance is the plan to invoke Martial Law for purpose of crushing civil unrest post Brexit.

The very fact that Mr Johnson PM considers Martial Law is necessary and has planned for thousands of troops to ‘assist police’ throughout Britain, is evidence that this government feels the UK populous and even, Parliament itself, are a threat to security for a lawfully suspected criminal, minority and largely foreign elite, after a no-deal Brexit. In that context and in light of evidence exposed herein, preparations for Martial Law, constitute a terrorist-threat via further abuse of power within public office and via conspiracy with foreign agents and interests.

Martial Law may be applied during times of war, temporary emergency such as invasion or major disaster, or in an occupied territory and most commonly, occurs after a coup d’état.

Mr Johnson PM’s unlawful proroguing of Parliament can be accurately and lawfully be described as a ‘coup’ whereby, he abused his powers of office to effectively, deny Parliament & democracy the right to act toward preventing all aforementioned risks and insidious-opportunities as are known and planned for, in event of a no-deal Brexit.

Certainly, since Parliament is judged to have been suspended/prorogued for the unlawful purpose of denying Parliamentary democracy that is known to be fully against the government’s desired no-deal Brexit (due precisely, to the catastrophic impact that would yield on every aspect of British society, health, security, economy and rights), plans as exposed via ‘Operation-Yellow-Hammer’/OYH, amount to an intent to implement Martial Law toward serving the reverse of what Martial Law in a democracy, is intended to serve, as opposed to the lawful democratic application of Martial Law which seeks to protect the population and associated interests of Parliament, economy and nation.

We cannot forget the fact, that men with guns and power over the public, are commonly known to abuse those powers; women & children are especially at risk.

In their defence, Mr Johnson PM and his British co-conspirators, consistently claim to be serving democracy and honouring the referendum vote of 2016, in favour of just 17.2 million British citizens from a population of over 60 million and, with the many among that 60 million, doomed to immeasurable hardship and even death via the hard-Brexit Mr Johnson claims is his ‘duty’ to now deliver.

It is for the very reason that substantially larger numbers than voted in the referendum or, who were for various reasons, unable to vote (e.g. Children under 18), will be severely impacted by withdrawal from the EU, that the referendum result itself, is legally only an ‘advisory’ vote from the public and thereafter, it is the duty of Parliament, to democratically and responsibly act on behalf of their respective constituents who collectively, form a far greater democratic majority than the 4% among 17.2 million Leave voters who formed a majority over the 48% who voted Remain.

Parliament is also, fully aware that the ‘Leave’ campaign was inherently dishonest and had employed a foreign, global social engineering corporation ‘Cambridge Analytica’ which is known to serve far-right interests in a variety of nations governed by despot powers and, for purpose of serving the same far-right agendas, have violated data-protection protocols and engaged in all manner of underhand tactics to persuade British citizens to effectively vote against their own and others best interests.

Added to these concerns, is evidence of unlawful finances funding the Leave campaign along with evidenced lies about the benefits of leaving the EU as well as, lies about the risks of remaining in the EU i.e. It was alleged that Britain pays £350 million a week into the EU and also, that Turkey was about to join the EU and subsequently, deliver “millions of Muslims” to Britain’s shores.

Such was the extent and impact of the Leave campaign propaganda, that on realising the truth, many among Leave voters have since changed their mind and most especially, on becoming fully informed of the catastrophic impact of a no-deal Brexit.

Parliament as electoral representatives of a far greater majority than 17 million, therefore, have a lawful/righteous duty of care to take all such evidence into account when faced with prospect of acting on the advice of the electorate’s Referendum i.e. The ‘adviser’/electorate is known to have delivered their advice on strength of misinformation and via manipulation from corporate-powers serving both minority British and foreign interests.

It is clear without doubt, that the 4% majority win on side of Leave, is no longer an accurate reflection of the electorate’s wishes and indeed, it is for this reason the opposition Leader of The Labour Party, Mr Jeremy Corbyn MP, has opted to include a 2nd Referendum in his Party Manifesto. Certainly, according to other EU nations criteria for a lawful Referendum, any evidence of foul-play via lies or disinformation, illegal funding and/or concealing of relevant information, renders that Referendum void and demands a 2nd Referendum.

It is important to note, that the Referendum vote did not include a ‘don’t know’ option. This is a very important point as over 40% of the electorate failed to vote and a fair majority of those directly due to being unsure about exactly, what they were voting for or against. Again, Parliament has a duty of care to acknowledge that failure of the Referendum to provide a ‘don’t-know’ option and most especially, in light of the somewhat disturbing fact, that the BBC and various other usually trusted news-providers, had failed to adequately inform the public in respect of the known and severe disadvantages of leaving the EU.

The BBC for example, had decided that being non-bias means balancing lies and truth as an ‘equal democratic choice’ and despite the undeniable fact that lies are known to serve anti-democratic/fascist interests. A democracy is known to be established specifically, for purpose of thwarting the rise of fascism whereby, minority agendas contrive to run a dictatorship which in turn, denies equal rights to various social groups according to ethnicity, faith, class, politics etc.

Also, Parliament cannot fail to take into account that many, perhaps a majority among Leave voters were persuaded by various government ministers, that in no circumstances would Britain exit from the EU without a ‘Deal’. Indeed, a hard-exit is what rogue nations can expect on expulsion from the EU; it is most unreasonable and actually ridiculous to suggest that a nation may be directed by a democratic government to vote in favour of its own expulsion from its trusted trade-union and thereafter, to suffer what amounts to, the kind of punishment meant for a criminal nation whose policies and aspirations are deemed undemocratic and unrighteous according to EU Law, Rights & Protocols.

Since a hard exit/expulsion from the EU would undoubtedly occur had Britain decided to ignore all of EU laws and legislation, clearly, erasing all such laws is the prime motive behind Mr Johnson & Tory plans for a hard Brexit in event of failing to achieve their unreasonable ‘deal’ proposal.
One might think that prior to entering the EU, Britain was some kind of savage nation which had no laws to protect the public, wildlife, the workforce or environment. It appears that freedom from the EU now grants Mr Johnson and elitist supporters, freedom to do as they please within the kind of social, political and ecological ethos as was the ‘norm’ in Britain during the 18th century.

In this sense, the nature of attack is very subtle while the impacts are strikingly visible and not least the cunning thus displayed i.e. A criminal wants to steal your goods but persuades you by underhand means, to give him the ‘right’ to just take what ever he pleases from you:

If Mr Johnson succeeded in getting his Brext, effectively, the Tory Party would have managed to literally wipe-out over 100 years of social, economic & political progress in Britain and by persuading the populous via xenophobic fear & threat, to agree in submitting themselves and our nation, to the kind of punishment reserved for hardened criminals i.e. We kick ourselves out of the EU as opposed to Tories flatly refusing to accept EU rules & regulations and they alone, being held responsible for the resulting catastrophe.

No nation would knowingly do it and no reasonable or sane Parliament would dare suggest it and yet somehow, millions of British people are persuaded via all manner of surreptitious means and not least, control within various internet social platforms such as Twitter, Facebook etc., that kicking ourselves out of our own very useful and beneficial Trade Union is ‘liberation’ and ‘freedom’ to be a slave in destitution?

Examining the hard facts of evidence, we’ve witnessed a cruel and nasty trick, the magician’s sleight of hand and suddenly, we are aware of the psychopathy behind it, that would throw a whole population over a cliff, to save his own skin and, as shall be revealed herein, it is the Brexit orchestrators who face the ‘cliff’ if they don’t get their desired hard Brexit.

Mr Johnson has publicly complained about the £1bn a month Britain pays into the EU, regardless of the fact that Britain does receive the full value of that £1bn spent (if indeed, in real-terms, that figure is correct), and meanwhile, he obviously had no problems at all with the £1+bn per week Britain is currently paying in ‘interest’ on the £1.27tn Banking-Bail-Out debt, for which, Britain receives, ‘Austerity’ delivering hardship, misery, sickness, homelessness, loneliness and death.

Have Britain’s allegedly ‘free-press’ not the intelligence to make such juxtapositions and thereby, fully alert the public as to how they’re being ‘played’ by political & economic tricksters and fraudsters? Are the BBC News Team not capable of presenting such juxtapositions to e.g. Tory MPs promoting Brexit via such arguments as aforementioned ‘£1bn a month’ to EU?

The reality behind Mr Johnson’s flippant “humbug” attitude is harsh. It is a created, imposed reality via Tories such as Iain Duncan Smith, who punched his fists and laughed with glee when his draconian cuts to Britain’s Benefits System, passed through Parliament, which then led directly to tens of thousands of deaths and for what purpose, if not only to cover the aforementioned £1+bn per week and simultaneously, grant tax cuts, bonuses, pay-rises and higher subsidies to the very rich?

If such tactics are not a crime, a perversion of democracy and government, then what is crime in this world? It is one thing to lie but to lie with criminal intent of deception, to rob and kill, to spare oneself from facing cuts to one’s own income and/or prosecution and instead, orchestrate persecution against the victims of your crime?

Mr Johnson’s comment about the £1bn per month to EU is evidence. It is evidence of deliberate distraction as every trickster employs and therein we understand that Mr Johnson is a trickster employed by tricksters who profit from their tricks and leave millions in their wake to suffer the consequence and pick up the pieces; they know what they’re doing but have no care, their strength they claim, is their inherent lack of compassion and that is their little ‘secret’ and their ‘code’, exactly as the small matter of £1bn a week being paid to a set of largely criminal & negligent bankers, has fast faded into the realms of secrecy too; hidden in plain sight.

The important point here is, we are dealing with a plan, a plot, a scheme; Brexit is not a random event: How does one loot and take control of a nation and scrap the citizens Human Rights without a military army and all under cover of democracy? It appears the world has yet to fully wake up to the reality and stealth-nature of 21st century terrorism.

The very fact that Mr Johnson PM and his Cabinet Ministers, have conspired to deny the democratic rights & duties of Parliament on strength of deliberate misinterpretation and abuse of his powers and for purpose of delivering a no-deal Brexit and/or a disadvantageous deal, to the degree he has planned implementation of Martial Law post-Brexit, is concrete evidence that Mr Johnson’s government and also, those among his backers ‘in-the-know,’ are rogue/criminal elements who have plotted to attempt a coup. Collectively, they represent a constitutional, military, economic and social threat against Britain as a peaceful United Kingdom:

Removing Mr Johnson from Office is not by itself, going to remove the ongoing threat from those who conspired to put him there for such nefarious purpose, in the first place.

All of the above points need to be raised in Parliament when faced with this government’s obfuscation and outright lies.

One of Mr Johnson PM’s ardent supporters and co-conspirators with vested interests in a no-deal Brexit, Mr Nigel Farage MEP, has very recently threatened to “take the knife” to Britain’s Civil Services in event of his desired hard-Brexit becoming reality; apparently, he has “had enough of them all!”

Another Johnson PM supporter, Brendan O’Neill, recently stated on National TV, that there “should be riots” in event of Brexit being cancelled and/or granted with a favourable deal.

There is plenty of evidence, including public statements from members of Mr Johnson PM’s own family, that wealthy financiers and corporations in Britain and abroad, have engaged in the egregious activity of hedging ‘bets’ against the strength of Britain’s sovereign currency, according to the foreseeable circumstance that a hard Brexit will impose a significant decrease in value of the £Pound.

This equates to the undeniable fact that those same interests now stand to take heavy financial losses in event of Brexit with a favourable deal and/or revoking of Article 50 in event of remaining an EU member via results of a 2nd referendum.

It is no surprise therefore, to understand that such powerful collective interests will be proactive toward inciting civil unrest and will continue with their divisive, inaccurate and unlawful narratives that claim a no-deal Brexit is to satisfy the democratic choice of British people.

Foreign interests feature rogue governments of other nations; these include predominantly, America and Israel, both nations governed by far-right extremists in the form of Mr Trump and until very recently, Mr Netenyahu, both of whom, have very close, personal relations with one another and also, with Mr Johnson PM as well as Mr Farage and ‘Tommy Robinson’ leader of the ‘English Defence League’ i.e. The day after proroguement of Parliament, Mr Netenyahu in capacity as Israeli PM, flew to Britain specifically, to visit Mr Johnson PM at No10. More recently, Mr Johnson was witnessed sitting with President Trump at The United Nations and with the pair giving a press-conference in which, President Trump expressed his faith in Johnson PM’s ability to deliver the desired no-deal Brexit. It is known that President Trump is keen to broker a USA-UK Trade Deal in return for corporate take-over of Britain’s NHS and on condition Britain abandons EU health & safety regulations on food.

Parliament, in light of the proposed deal with USA, again, has a democratic duty to ensure that any deal with USA as opposed to EU, is more advantageous to Britain as a whole than a deal with the EU.

In considering the proposed USA deal, Parliament cannot ignore the fact that there is as yet, no deal with America, that Congress is committed to blocking that deal in event of a hard Brexit imposing a hard border across Ireland/scrapping the Good-Friday-Agreement and, the fact that Britain on leaving the EU, will instantly lose all of the 168 deals we have with other nations via EU membership.

The point is; Parliament exists to ensure that the democratic will of the people is not exploited or manipulated to the degree that a populous is persuaded to vote foolishly and subsequently, expecting Parliament to display equal folly such as, unquestioningly abiding by a non-legally binding, advisory Referendum that will without doubt, deliver catastrophe that a misinformed populous are unaware of and will be fundamentally against and to the degree, it will require Martial Law to implement.

OYH for example, refers to rationing and sky rocketing increases in prices of food and other goods – again, corporate interests stocking up on food etc., are hoping to make huge profits in event of a no-deal Brexit and meanwhile, a rapidly falling £pound and a populous already struggling under severe austerity, will be hard pressed to buy adequate food supplies and millions left to depend on foodbank-charities.

Most disturbingly, Mr Johnson’s government has issued a public statement claiming they have ‘no legal responsibility to supply food’ during times of natural disaster or on leaving the EU. Nonetheless, the government is prepared to supply body bags for the tens of thousands at risk of death via a hard Brexit, as it is known the government has invested in a stockpile of body-bags as part of their post-Brexit preparations.

Since it will take on average, at least two years for any of Britain’s existing 168 trade deals via EU, to be renegotiated, it appears rationing and Martial Law will become the mainstay of UK society far into the foreseeable future. How will democracy operate within Martial Law? How long can Martial Law and/or a State-Of-Emergency lawfully last?

Considering Mr Johnson PM and co-conspirators have publicly stated their intent to ignore the law, have actually broken the law and are known liars, Parliament has no choice but to assume the resulting coup, fully intends to permanently erase democracy from Britain via all of the mechanisms as shared herein. Indeed, one of the first post Brexit Acts intended by Mr Johnson PM, is to “scrap” Human Rights.

The EU has a duty of care to act in the interests of Scotland and Northern Ireland for purpose of assuring and supporting their independence from England & Wales and due precisely to the fact that Mr Johnson PM’s government is set on scrapping their Human Rights. In face of a known liar and law-breaker, there is nothing Mr Johnson can say that may lawfully convince the EU or for that matter, Parliament, that he will instead, scrap his commitment to scrapping Human Rights.

This means that a break up of the United Kingdom and/or a resurgence of terrorism in Northern Ireland and/or civil unrest in Scotland, is a very likely prospect for a post no-deal-Brexit-Britain.

Considering all of the severe disadvantages as listed above, coupled with the benefits thus to be gained by minority interests, can there be any reasonable argument to support the notion that Brexit is not tantamount to a terrorist plot, devised among the highest orders governing global economy and corporate-finances?

Further Points Of Concern

According to all of the concerns and evidence shared herein, Britain’s Parliament and that of EU, cannot reasonably avoid the lawful suspicion that Britain under rule of Mr Johnson and his cohorts, is facing a lawfully identified threat against every aspect of our national security & economy which, does include threats via collusion with foreign powers in the form of Mr Netenyahu and Mr Trump both of whom, are facing investigations into lawfully suspected criminal activity and abuse of public office within their own nations.

Added to those concerns is the presence of corporate military & security services within Britain i.e. Dyncorp and their newly granted powers to bring in staff/troops from abroad, all available for hire to Mr Johnson’s government for purpose of e.g. ‘keeping-the-peace’. Dyncorp, on hire by USA, deployed throughout the Middle East and answerable to no one, is known to have been engaged in training members of ISIS and involved in human & child trafficking.

Though to date, USA & Israel as nations, are assumed as ‘allies’ to Britain, this does not mean we may casually ignore any circumstance in which the status of ‘friend’ is abused to extent that ‘friend’ is in fact, plotting against Britain’s best interests via their own commitment to far-right, extremist interests which run against Britain’s own interests and thereby, covertly and overtly threaten our national security.

It is clear that USA for example, is currently under control of a similarly rogue government as headed by Mr Trump who, is presently under impeachment investigations due to his own collusion with foreign powers in his efforts to undermine USA democracy.

Since Congress as democratic equivalent to UK Parliament, has now by majority, committed to embark on impeachment investigations against their sitting President, it is beholden on UK Parliament to acknowledge that status of ‘allie’ applies for now, solely to Congress and not, to President Trump who is himself, in service to the same corporate and largely foreign interests as Mr Johnson PM, namely, Russian and Israeli.

Russian Brexit interests are at present, largely, oligarchal in terms of financial gains to certain individuals. In case of Israel, however, interests are both financial and political in terms of a strategy to support vested interests for Israel’s ruling political Party, to fulfil their ambition to possess the whole of Palestine and even, lands beyond that border.

The fact is, that Israel under rule of the Zionist Party, has broken a variety of international laws and regularly commits flagrant abuses against Human Rights of Palestinians who are openly judged ‘inferior’ and even as ‘vermin’ by said Party. While Britain may remain committed as friend to the nation of Israel as an entity, Parliament has no choice but to recognise the inherent criminality presently governing Israel and illegally occupying Palestinian lands with brutal if not savage force.

Already, EU nations and Britain especially, are expressing disgust and rage in face of Zionist atrocities and in this respect, Zionists recognise a powerful force of obstruction and global condemnation against their plans for satisfying the ambitions of their ‘Greater Israel Project‘.

Therefore, it is no surprise to witness Israeli support for Mr Johnson PM and his hard-Brexit: Mr Farage has publicly ‘predicted the European Union may collapse within two years if Boris Johnson succeeds in securing a Brexit that delivers on demands for independence from the bloc’ (implying that Britain is a captive of the EU rather than an independent member).

Certainly, the ways of democracy in Israel are in no way aligned with EU nations and equally as certainly, Mr Johnson PM’s no-deal Brexit threatens to impose a very similar approach to governance here in Britain and from there, into the whole of Europe i.e. Democracy for the few against the interests and rights of the many and as in Israel, equally dependent too, on military enforcement to maintain that imbalanced status-quo.

The extract below as published by The Telegraph August 2019: Presents active evidence of an ongoing propaganda initiative – spinning the narrative to lay foundations for the suspected global-corporate-coup and break-up of our nation and even, the entire EU. Do we casually accept that the conclusions of their alleged ‘Think Tank’ are in any way ‘friendly’ or in service to the interests of democracy?:

‘Two thirds of millennials favour “strong leaders who do not have to bother with parliament”, according to a poll revealing a sharp rejection of liberal principles.
‘The report by Onward, the centre-right think tank, found that 66 per cent of 25 to 34-year-olds favour ‘strongman’ leaders while 26 per cent believe democracy is a bad way to run the country – and 36 per cent would support army rule.’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/08/07/third-millennials-want-martial-law-66-per-cent-prefer-strong/

Note the ‘spin’ here is first, to subtly promote the notion that a democratic-parliament is a liberal principle and secondly, on how the figures are presented i.e. ‘The report by Onward, the centre-right think tank, found that 66 per cent of 25 to 34-year-olds favour ‘strongman’ leaders while 26 per cent believe democracy is a bad way to run the country – and 36 per cent would support army rule’:

The report focusing on a specific age-group of 25-34 year old’s find that the minority of UK citizens forming that age-group, by majority, favour ‘strongman leaders’ and, that a majority of them do not believe democracy is a ‘bad way to run the country’ and a slightly smaller majority, would not support ‘army rule’. These are the obvious facts of the report which are nonetheless, presented to suggest that the average 25 – 34 year old’s among UK citizens are basically in favour a far-right/fascist-style governance.

This type of ‘spin’ constitutes the mainstay of far-right narratives in that they manage to promote the negative as a ‘positive’ and in that process, denigrate the positive as ‘negative’ – another ‘magician’s’ trick we need to recognise as a ‘criminally-subversive’ form of mind-control which, holds such power that a bragging, self confessed sex-offender can be elected as President of the United States i.e. Various minorities of extremists, criminals, subversive and for the most part, gullible characters among the populous, are liberated, impressed and even, comforted – such are the powers of the resulting cult-fan-base; a dangerous force to unleash in any nation, a force that has been given a ‘right’ to do wrong.

The same has worked successfully for Israeli Zionists for decades and it is a weapon within the covert-terrorist’s agendas. Mr Johnson PM it appears, is presently a pupil in this narrative under tutorship of his mentor-in-chief, Mr Dominic Cummings.

It is therefore, most pertinent to the concerns shared herein, that such levels of ‘news’ are now more than ever, being published in UK mainstream press and at this moment of history, in which Parliament has had to take the extraordinary measures of having a case against Mr Johnson PM and his government, heard in the Supreme Court due to his attempts to effectively shut down Parliament/Democracy.

Clearly, elements of Britain’s media are equally suspect as co-conspirators and as corporate entities managed by far-right individuals such as e.g. Mr Rupert Murdoch who is equally, as heavily involved in USA politics & media as he is in Britain’s.

Mr Murdoch is without doubt, fully supportive of both Mr Trump and Mr Johnson’s desires for a no-deal Brexit being as any deal currently acceptable to the EU, does not include a hard border across Ireland and maintains an insistence that Britain abides by EU rules & regulations and not least, the ‘dreaded’ tax-regulations due to become effective in Britain January 2020. Tax regulations which inevitably involves EU scrutiny on all businesses established or operating within Britain and which include, Mr Murdoch’s own financial & business interests.

As document A explains, the proposed EU tax regulations and restrictions against tax-havens, caused such major consternation among the Tory government and their backers, that they collectively commanded Mr Cameron PM to try and extricate Britain from submitting to them. On realising there was no way out, they embarked on finding a strategy by which to leave the EU i.e. A Referendum and the ‘Leave’ campaign which in turn, recruited support from other far right interests via the English Defence League (known for its supporters terrorist actions against British Muslims) and UKIP which strongly opposes immigration and immigrants.

Since EDL & UKIP have no significant if any members seated in Parliament, it is again, deeply disturbing that such minority and subversive non-Parliamentary political parties have vested interests in assisting Mr Johnson PM and equally Mr Trump as well as, Mr Netenyahu and also, that supporters of all of those parties are known to engage in extremist and/or terrorist actions against innocent people on grounds of ethnicity, faith, gender, politics or class.

It is here noted with deep concern that members of the Supreme Court Judiciary were subject to threats and also, members of Parliament who have acted to thwart Mr Johnson PM’s actions, have received death threats and, in remembrance of the late Jo Cox MP murdered by a far-right Brexit supporter in the run-up to the Referendum, it is clear that Parliament and Britain’s Security Services, need to fully accept the veracity of such threats as a fundamental feature of a coup that is itself, a dire and deadly threat against Britain as an economy, an independent, United Kingdom and, as a democracy.

Ultimately, Brexit is about ONE single objective: Protecting the interests of the top 10% and their global corporations from EU Law and Tax regulations. Collectively, the powers behind Mr Johnson PM, hope to establish and manage, post-Brexit Britain as a tax-haven:

‘Just to put this in context, Singapore has rapidly expanded its role as an offshore financial centre in the past decade, currently ranks number five on the Financial Secrecy Index, and has a secrecy score of 67. That secrecy score reflects general weaknesses in Singapore’s corporate transparency regime and low level of commitment to tackling corporate tax dodging.

So this raises questions about what senior politicians in London mean when they talk about Singapore-on-the-Thames. Mr *Javid – a serious contender to replace Theresa May as leader of the Conservative Party, who has worked as a banker in Singapore – has spoken about using tax cuts and deregulation as part of a “shock and awe strategy” to transform the post-Brexit UK economy.

What the Singapore-on-the-Thames visionaries appear to have in mind can be summed up as:

A commitment to sweeping tax cuts for corporations and mobile rich people – tax wars as a fiscal weapon;
Tax measures such as accelerated capital allowances to attract mobile investments to UK;
Comprehensive de-regulation, removal of social and environmental protections;
Weak or non-existent compliance with international anti-money laundering measures;
Retaining golden visa arrangements to provide residence rights of wealthy non-British citizens, increasing exposure to oligarchs and corrupt illicit financial flows.’
https://www.taxjustice.net/2019/01/23/brexit-and-the-future-of-tax-havens/

*It is noted with alarm, that Mr Javid is now Chancellor of the Exchequer.

However, it is not merely restrictions on access to tax-havens and cuts in profits, as posed by EU Tax regulations, that Britain’s top financial-beneficiaries most fear, it is the inevitable scrutiny on all businesses and companies currently registered in Britain.

Such scrutiny will undoubtedly uncover and publicly expose, a magnitude of crime and criminals presently operating with impunity, much of which, has already been made public via the dedicated efforts of retired RAF Engineer, Mr Gordon Bowden who has for 17 years, tried without success, to persuade the powers of UK police, government and media, to investigate and/or deliver the necessary prosecutions.

While it has proven a simple matter to thoroughly ignore Mr Bowden’s evidence and relegate his information to the ‘alternative/fake-news’ zone as a ‘wild-conspiracy-theory’, Britain’s top criminals have no such inside influence over EU Parliament and their associated bodies of power:

‘What we are talking about here is a global asset-stripping £multi-billion money-laundering operation on an industrial scale being carried out by MPs, Lords, Knights, Dames, celebrities and sportsmen alike, and Gordon Bowden can prove it. He has got files and documentation to back this claim up, information that could, potentially, bring the whole House of Cards and ‘The Establishment’ down with it and put a lot of well-known people behind bars for years for their involvement in what is, essentially, theft and money-laundering on a grand scale.’
http://www.gordonbowden.co.uk/finchley-road-fraud/

Examining Mr Bowden’s evidence in light especially, of the Chilcot Inquiry, it appears that Mr Blair PM was persuaded by rogue elements within UK Intelligence Services, that Saddam had WMD’s/nuclear weapons hidden in Iraq. The information was classified ‘top secret’ due to the sensitive nature as to how he had acquired them. This was not information that Mr Blair PM was at liberty to disclose to Parliament.

It is quite possible that Mr Blair PM was subject to undue pressure to keep this information secret via coercion, according to evidence of his being involved in sexual encounters with older males during his youth via an activity commonly known as ‘cottaging’ and which takes place in and around men’s public toilets.

That evidence was leaked and appeared briefly in some of Britain’s gutter press, from there, it quickly descended into ‘alternative news’, none of the more ‘trusted’ news medias picked up on the story and certainly, it was not discussed within any TV news channels. During this time, Britain’s use of the internet was minimal and many of the regular and trusted alternative news platforms now available, were not then in existence. Perhaps, the story was leaked enough and in vague enough terms, so as to warn Mr Blair that at any moment such news or perhaps worse, could explode into the glare of ‘Sky’ or BBC and thereby, receive mass public attention?

This method of coercion is well known as consistently used by ‘intelligence’ via such individuals as Savile and Epstein and, in case of Epstein, Mr Acosta, his lawyer and later Labour Secretary under President Trump, confirmed under oath that Epstien was “working with intelligence“.

Such methods are by now irrefutable and fully confirmed via the disclosure of a UK Intelligence translator Ms Katharine Gun, who blew the whistle on ‘intelligence’ from America requesting UK Intelligence assistance toward ‘finding dirt’ on various UN officials, in order to put pressure on them to support military invasion of Iraq.

15 Years Later: How U.K. Whistleblower Katharine Gun Risked Everything to Leak Damning Iraq War Memo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWtIu7mbnbM&t=3s

‘Sometimes you come across a story that seems so unbelievable that you simply can’t absorb and process the information properly. It doesn’t compute or make much sense – until an investigation produces evidence.
The allegation is this. David Cameron sold three nuclear weapons of a foreign state, put them in unsafe hands and the Conservative party banks nearly £19 million which then sets the pretext for a conflict that kills a million people. ‘

In summary, it appears that Apartheid South Africa was permitted via UK, Israeli & USA far-right interests, to build 10 nuclear weapons one of which was tested, leaving a total of nine. Those weapons were then removed from South Africa moments before Mandela came to power.

Peter Eyre writes that David Cameron visited South Africa in 1989 accompanied by Conservative MP, Sir Kenneth Warren, and nuclear weapons inspector, Dr David Kelly. Kelly had made a number of earlier visits having been given access to the covert nuclear weapons research facility at Pelindaba, near Pretoria.

An excerpt from part two of his documentation [4]:
“I find it amazing that David Cameron and others travelled to South Africa during the embargo period and not only violated international law but also violated international law in dealing with nuclear weapons that were not known to the UN. In 1989 David Cameron and others went down to South Africa to carry out some sinister plan that resulted in only 6 operational nuclear weapons going back to the US for de commissioning.The other three were to be purchased by the British Government as a standby mechanism against Saddam. Remember this is all under the radar of the United Nations!”

Eyre stated that David Cameron’s trip, although officially ‘a fact-finding mission,’ [5] which was heavily criticised at the time, was to arrange for three of South Africa’s nuclear weapons to be shipped to the Arabian peninsular, where they would be stored in case they were required in Iraq. This fact alone is alarming. These weapons were not only stored unsafely but they were stored in a volatile region and subsequently went missing.‘

https://www.globalresearch.ca/david-camerons-secret-nuclear-weapons-deal-raised-17-8m-for-conservative-party-funds-sets-pretext-for-war/5592009

Correspondence from Gordon Bowden to the Attorney General, Dominic Grieve:
Sent: Fri, 10 June, 2011 14:12:30
Subject: DR DAVID KELLY
Dear Rt Hon Dominic Charles Robert Grieve.
You will refer the forwarded reply from your official office below, dated Sunday 22 August 2010 timed at: 15:42:08. I make and hold on record this further legal communication to you and the added list of Cc Recipients, forwarded to you via your Constituency address.
As a Duty of Care: Given the recovered Documents of Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON I hold, duplicated, forwarded and held safe by others.
I make accusation that you have, as Attorney General committed Treason, lied and conspired with others in perverted the course of Justice, using your respected and trusted Public Office as Attorney General to refuse a new inquiry into the conspired Death of Dr David Kelly.

I make legal accusation. You have used your legal, trusted and public Political position, to criminally protect those who hold high Conservative Government Office, current and Past from facing Criminal prosecution (Under the Nuclear Explosions Act) and Deliberate criminal Fraud involving an Overcharge to the Treasury of £17.8 Million to Purchase covertly 3 Nuclear Bombs from ARMSCOR, the £17.8 million laundered into the “EMPTY” Tory accounts as recorded in HANSARD via a front UK registered Company of Rhodesian John Arnold Bredenkamp.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/08/the-color-of-david-camerons-underwear/

With all of the above in mind, it seems that Mr Blair was convinced by British Intelligence Services that Iraq held three of the missing South African nuclear warheads. However, it appears Dr David Kelly was aware that those weapons were not located in Iraq and as a matter of conscience, was taking steps to correctly inform Parliament that there were definitely no WMDs in Iraq and to thereby, extricate Britain from involvement in what amounted to, an illegal invasion. Dr David Kelly was quickly silenced; his alleged ‘suicide’ remains highly suspect in the sense that all of the evidence strongly suggests he was murdered.

Basically, according to the evidence; a group of globally powerful criminals, not only deal in secret nuclear weapons and receive huge financial rewards, from there, they get to become and/or control UK Government and then, use evidence of their crimes to ‘justify’ an illegal invasion of Iraq, bomb the place with illegal weapons causing a crisis in child deformities, still births and cancer and thereafter, leave ISIS to run amok.
When Mr Blair PM assured Iraqi people they were to be “liberated” did he envisage that ‘liberation’ included Iraqi teenagers being hung or decapitated for watching football or listening to rock music?

Shockingly, in 2011, the MoD had to apologise to Parliament for lying about depleted uranium. After questions from a Labour MP, the MoD was forced to admit that contrary to his previous statements to Parliament, depleted uranium weapons had not been through Geneva Weapons Review:

‘Nick Harvey admitted that he had inadvertently misled MPs about a Ministry of Defence review that he said had concluded the weapons were permissible on humanitarian and environmental grounds under the Geneva conventions.’

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/nov/14/minister-sorry-dangers-depleted-uranium

In context of present day events regarding Brexit and the kind of people the actually criminal Tory Party and cohorts, have installed into no10 as ‘government’, Parliament can be in no doubt as to the true nature of the powers behind the Tory ‘throne’ and as to just how far they will go, toward serving each others interests.

It’s not just Britain’s alliance with the EU that is under attack here, it is also, the European Union as an entity as a voice of power, law, rights and reason on the world stage. Basically, every nation is at risk and Britain it appears, is at the forefront now in confronting and eradicating the presently covert-threat.

With our very planet at stake requiring urgent action which does include overriding present corporate-profits sustaining various criminal powers and entities, Britain as a nation, needs to take courage and invest faith in our ancient institutions and, our monarchy, to uphold and utilise the full weight of law to humanity’s and our planet’s advantage.

The time for divisive, opposing partisan politics is over. Power of governance needs to be granted only to those of sound moral & ethical stature and who are most proficient in upholding the law and all of the rights and values which best sustain a viable and compassionate democracy, for where there is no compassion there is no intelligence and bereft of true intelligence, humanity as a species, is doomed and precisely because intelligence is the unique facet of our being among all other life-forms on Earth: We either serve the life of our planet or we destroy that life for ‘fun’ and ‘profits’ to a privileged, disconnected few who exist in the realms of fantasy and who cannot be trusted to provide a future worth living to the next generation nor even, assure their own survival.

It is therefore expedient that Labour MP’s and shadow cabinet, take steps to reach out across all parties within Parliament and within Intelligence, police, military & Civil Service and also, to the same among trusted sources with EU Parliament with an objective of investigating, arresting & prosecuting key suspects in these insipid ‘games’ as thus exposed herein.

It is necessary, to ask questions in Parliament and for purpose of thereby, informing the public who, deserve to know what their taxes have funded and who has been operating in our name. Such questions will equally empower and embolden civil-servants who to date, have had nowhere to turn with what on the surface, appears as ‘incredible’ information.

Questions need then, to be followed by direct action and perhaps in case of certain individuals, prompt arrest and/or an Inquiry into e.g. The Israel Lobby: Does Israel hold a cache of undisclosed/illegal WMD’s? Until an Israeli government is prepared to provide an answer to that question, there really can be no place for an ‘Israel Lobby’ within Parliament, for surely, as the only (illegal) nuclear power in the Middle East, Israel is not truly the ‘vulnerable’ and ‘persecuted’ nation it purports to be.

Of special importance is the boost to Tory funds via the illegal sale of illegal nuclear weapons which, by nefarious and fraudulent methods extracted over £17-19million from UK public coffers and placed them directly into prominent Tory members and the Party’s accounts.

As a nation and as a democracy, we cannot permit such evidence and crimes to pass unchallenged and perhaps, it is only through exposing the evidence, that far-right elements among the UK public, recruited as unwitting victims of propaganda, will finally be placated in face of the crimes their present “heroes” are very likely guilty of.

The days of ‘conspiracy-theory’ are over – the evidence clearly supports the reality of conspiracy-fact. It is therefore, beholden on all future UK governments, to embark on a process of tightening up on every aspect of economy, national security, police, intelligence and military operations.
Special protection needs to be available for ‘whistleblowers’ and strict vetting of all persons entering into public office with equally strict penalties for crimes committed while in public office for clearly, the traditional ‘softly-softly’ approach has facilitated ever worse crimes.

Various news medias within the mainstream as are known complicits on side of far-right propaganda and agendas, have buried ‘unsavoury’ news and/or resorted to hate-campaigns on behalf of their hidden dictators i.e. Jeremy Corbyn MP is irrationally compared to Stalin.

The mainstream news medias are known and are lawfully evidenced, to have conspired with lawful suspects and their high-profile supporters, for purpose of burying details and information/news citing severe anomalies in issues around police and local authorities handling of crime reports citing organised child sexual abuse, child trafficking and murder of children. Countless children have suffered as a direct result: Again, under control of covertly-fascist agendas, the role of the media is reversed to serving purpose of keeping secrets instead of exposing them as a matter of public interest in terms of e.g. Defending children’s rights & welfare.

It is glaringly apparent that our present laws are seriously out-of-date and out-of-touch with reality.

Perhaps the media by law, needs to be prohibited from publishing unsubstantiated fictions as ‘news’ and/or ‘spinning’ facts to promote fiction as ‘news’? i.e. A code of ethics demanding responsibility, awareness and commitment to reflecting and serving, rather than imposing public interest and opinion; otherwise, more people will continue to distrust the mainstream and rely heavily on alternative news-providers many of whom, are covertly controlled by the same far-right entities controlling mainstream narratives.

Since it is impossible to as strictly monitor independent/alternative news providers without infringing on rights of free speech etc., the only way to protect the public is via assurance of a genuinely free and non-bias press – a mainstream news service that is independent, ethical and accountable.

Left to their own devices, the criminals of power will continue to undermine democracy within every nation. They remain to this day, an external and internal threat and it’s high time we focused our energies toward diminishing both their powers and influence, as is visible in all its horror throughout this world.

It’s time to clean up our act and in that process, our planet too. Our children need action, they need hope and they need guidance from above, they need to know that crime does not pay and that respect, due diligence, competence and compassion, are righteously rewarded. Unfortunately, as I write, the very opposite is true and that needs to change: We as a nation, need to change – to progress into all that our forebears dreamed we can and will be: True Human Beings in a respectful and caring world. Without respect, freedom cannot be.

Rerferences:

Security Services Act 1989 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/5/pdfs/ukpga_19890005_en.pdf

Boris Johnson hits back at Supreme Court ruling saying people want to ‘frustrate Brexit’ and ‘stop this country coming out of the EU’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/09/24/brexit-latest-news-supreme-court-ruling-boris-johnson-prorogue/

Operation Yellow Hammer
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/831199/20190802_Latest_Yellowhammer_Planning_assumptions_CDL.pdf

Government ‘planning for martial law’ under emergency no-deal Brexit preparations
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/foreign-affairs/brexit/news/101397/government-planning-martial-law-under-emergency-no-deal

Leave campaign broke election law but won’t be prosecuted, police say
https://metro.co.uk/2019/09/13/leave-campaign-broke-election-law-but-wont-be-prosecuted-police-say-10737879/?ito=cbshare

Fresh Evidence Relating To Cambridge Analytica And Brexit Campaign Published By DCMS Committee
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/cambridge-analytica-dcms-evidence-brexit-leave-eu/

Could Brexit break the BBC? The tensions, the bewildering question of ‘balance’—and how to get it right
https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/mark-damazer-bbc-brexit-coverage-bias

Why the mainstream media should stop giving extreme views a platform
http://theconversation.com/why-the-mainstream-media-should-stop-giving-extreme-views-a-platform-101040

Interest bill on UK’s £1.27 trillion debt to hit £1bn a week
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10849333/Interest-bill-on-UKs-1.27-trillion-debt-to-hit-1bn-a-week.html

No police action over Farage vow to ‘take knife’ to Whitehall
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/28/police-investigate-nigel-farage-knife-comments

Brexiteer says ‘there should be riots’ over Brexit in the style of gilets jaunes
https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/brendan-o-neill-on-politics-live-1-6294304

Hedge funds make £7bn bet against pound as Brexit bites
https://www.standard.co.uk/business/hedge-funds-make-7bn-bet-against-pound-as-brexit-bites-a4216371.html

Bercow calls Tommy Robinson ‘repellent’ after Ukip Lords invite
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/24/john-bercow-calls-tommy-robinson-repellent-ukip-lords-invite

Analysis Boris Johnson Is More Like Netanyahu Than Trump
https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/.premium-boris-johnson-is-more-like-netanyahu-than-trump-1.7395174

Netanyahu to meet with Boris Johnson on surprise trip to London
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/netanyahu-boris-johnson-london-trip-mark-esper-a9092011.html

Brexit Party: Senior official defended ‘persecuted’ Tommy Robinson and mocked Islamophobia
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-party-nigel-farage-tommy-robinson-islamophobia-edl-noel-matthews-a8912196.html

We’ll block trade deal if Brexit imperils open Irish border, say US politicians
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jul/31/brexit-mess-with-good-friday-and-well-block-uk-trade-deal-us-politicians-warn

Government says it has no duty to secure food supplies in a no-deal Brexit (nor any other crisis)
https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/sep19_government_says_it_has_no_duty_to_secure_food_in_a_crisis/

Government ‘stockpiling body bags’ says doctor who contributed to Yellowhammer
https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/government-stockpiling-body-bags-says-yellowhammer-doctor-1-6250748

EU Referendum Briefing 6: A Bonfire of Rights? EU Employment and Equality Law after Brexit
http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/06/eu-referendum-briefing-6-bonfire-of.html

After Brexit, the Tories want to scrap our Human Rights Act
https://eu-rope.ideasoneurope.eu/2019/03/10/after-brexit-the-tories-want-to-scrap-our-human-rights-act/

Trump impeachment: Whistleblower ‘endangered’ by Trump criticism
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49881847

Netanyahu Pleads Not Guilty to Criminal Charges Ahead of Hearing, but Offers No Claims to Back Innocence
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/elections/.premium-netanyahu-sends-ag-document-pleading-not-guilty-but-offers-no-claims-to-back-it-up-1.7889554

Dyncorp, The Private Military Corporation At The Heart Of Foreign Policy Scandal
https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/03/dyncorp-the-private-military-corporation-at-the-heart-of-foreign-policy-scandal/

Is “ISIS” hq U.S. actually “DynCorp” ??
https://friendsforsyria.com/2015/04/26/is-isis-hq-u-s-actually-dyncorp/

Fox News host stunned as Farage predicts ‘end of EU’ within two years if Brexit delivered
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1171866/Fox-news-Brexit-Nigel-Farage-leave-EU-end-UK-no-deal-Boris-Johnson-latest

“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

Video: Shocking words of Israeli leaders read aloud in Irish parliament
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/video-shocking-words-israeli-leaders-read-aloud-irish-parliament

Rupert Murdoch’s Empire: The Brexit Syndicate
https://thebrexitsyndicate.com/2018/07/04/the-rupert-murdoch-empire/

Supreme court litigant advised to buy stab vest after death threats
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/sep/26/supreme-court-litigant-advised-to-buy-stab-vest-after-death-threats

Dominic Greave protects the Conservative Party by refusing another Kelly inquiry
https://eyreinternational.wordpress.com/tag/gordon-bowden/

Chilcot report: Blair didn’t tell truth about WMDs, the deal with Bush or the warnings of fallout – how Britain went to war in Iraq
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-inquiry-tony-blair-iraq-war-weapons-of-mass-destruction-evidence-verdict-a7122361.html

Do you remember what happened to David Kelly?
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/do-you-remember-what-happened-to-david-kelly/

Doctors claim cover-up over death of weapons expert Dr David Kelly
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/doctors-claim-coverup-over-death-of-weapons-expert-dr-david-kelly-29426678.html

Depleted Uranium and Radioactive Contamination in Iraq: An Overview
https://www.globalresearch.ca/depleted-uranium-and-radioactive-contamination-in-iraq-an-overview/5605215

A Generation of Birth Defects in Fallujah: Fifteen Years after the Bombing of Phosphorus
https://www.al-menasa.net/en/2019/05/02/a-generation-of-birth-defects-in-fallujah-fifteen-years-after-the-bombing-of-phosphorus/

ISIS executes 13 teens for watching soccer
https://nypost.com/2015/01/19/isis-executes-13-teens-for-watching-soccer/

Iraqi ’emo’ youths reportedly killed by conservative militias
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-17333275

Isis regaining strength in Iraq and Syria fewer than six months after Trump celebrated victory, military officials warn
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-trump-iraq-syria-attacks-military-a9071691.html

5 Years Later: How U.K. Whistleblower Katharine Gun Risked Everything to Leak Damning Iraq War Memo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWtIu7mbnbM&t=3s